ETCG vs. GSUI
ETCG (Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC)) and GSUI (Grayscale Sui Staking ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds from Grayscale - ETCG tracks the Ethereum Classic (ETC) while GSUI tracks the CoinDesk SUI Reference Rate. Both are passively managed. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ETCG charges 2.50%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for GSUI.
Performance
ETCG vs. GSUI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETCG achieves a -35.40% return, which is significantly higher than GSUI's -39.93% return.
ETCG
- 1D
- 1.15%
- 1M
- -6.17%
- YTD
- -35.40%
- 6M
- -44.65%
- 1Y
- -51.42%
- 3Y*
- -10.63%
- 5Y*
- -35.81%
- 10Y*
- —
GSUI
- 1D
- -1.09%
- 1M
- -12.82%
- YTD
- -39.93%
- 6M
- -46.50%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETCG vs. GSUI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ETCG Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC) | -35.40% | -15.88% |
GSUI Grayscale Sui Staking ETF | -39.93% | -34.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETCG and GSUI is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2025 | 0.57 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETCG vs. GSUI — Risk / Return Rank
ETCG
GSUI
ETCG vs. GSUI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC) (ETCG) and Grayscale Sui Staking ETF (GSUI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETCG | GSUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.83 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.32 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.78 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.19 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETCG | GSUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.83 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.38 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.18 | -0.78 | +0.60 |
Drawdowns
ETCG vs. GSUI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETCG drawdown since its inception was -96.59%, which is greater than GSUI's maximum drawdown of -60.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETCG and GSUI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETCG | GSUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.59% | -60.73% | -35.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -66.46% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -78.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -92.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.33% | -60.73% | -34.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.67% | -43.81% | -38.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 43.41% | — | — |
Volatility
ETCG vs. GSUI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETCG | GSUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.37% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.81% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 62.03% | 107.79% | -45.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 94.03% | 107.79% | -13.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 115.33% | 107.79% | +7.54% |
ETCG vs. GSUI - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETCG has a 2.50% expense ratio, which is higher than GSUI's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETCG vs. GSUI - Dividend Comparison
Neither ETCG nor GSUI has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ETCG and GSUI have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GSUI is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GSUI is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for ETCG.
ETCG and GSUI have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
ETCG tracks Ethereum Classic (ETC), while GSUI tracks CoinDesk SUI Reference Rate. Their fees differ too: 2.50% for ETCG and 0.00% for GSUI.
Find the right allocation for ETCG and GSUI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer