GSOL vs. GLNK
GSOL (Grayscale Solana Staking ETF) and GLNK (Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds from Grayscale. GSOL is actively managed, while GLNK is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 means they have usually moved in the same direction. GSOL charges 0.35%/yr vs 2.50%/yr for GLNK.
Performance
GSOL vs. GLNK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GSOL
- 1D
- -2.30%
- 1M
- -9.38%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
GLNK
- 1D
- -4.11%
- 1M
- 5.09%
- 6M
- -24.29%
- YTD
- -33.63%
- 1Y
- -73.63%
- 3Y*
- -20.97%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -2.38%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.63M | $1.89M | $1.97M | |
| $24.46M | $26.70M | $26.53M |
GSOL vs. GLNK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GSOL Grayscale Solana Staking ETF | -8.77% |
GLNK Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF | -12.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSOL and GLNK is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.85 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSOL vs. GLNK — Risk / Return Rank
GSOL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GLNK
GSOL vs. GLNK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Solana Staking ETF (GSOL) and Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF (GLNK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GSOL | GLNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.84 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.87 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.03 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GSOL vs. GLNK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSOL drawdown since its inception was -22.60%, smaller than the maximum GLNK drawdown of -96.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSOL and GLNK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSOL | GLNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.60% | -96.25% | +73.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -89.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -96.25% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.84% | -95.73% | +84.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.75% | -57.20% | +47.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 75.11% | — |
Volatility
GSOL vs. GLNK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSOL | GLNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 12.97% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 45.67% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.28% | 100.63% | -33.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.28% | 161.98% | -94.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 67.28% | 161.98% | -94.70% |
GSOL vs. GLNK - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSOL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than GLNK's 2.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
GSOL vs. GLNK - Dividend Comparison
Neither GSOL nor GLNK has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GSOL and GLNK have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GSOL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GSOL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for GLNK.
GSOL and GLNK have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Their fees differ too: 0.35% for GSOL and 2.50% for GLNK.
Find the right allocation for GSOL and GLNK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer