ETCG vs. BFAP

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

ETCG (Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC)) and BFAP (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April) are both Cryptocurrency funds. ETCG is passively managed, while BFAP is actively managed. Over the past year, ETCG returned -50.68% vs -28.52% for BFAP. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ETCG charges 2.50%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BFAP.

Performance

ETCG vs. BFAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC) (ETCG) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April (BFAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETCG achieves a -38.17% return, which is significantly lower than BFAP's -23.65% return.

ETCG

• 1D: 3.62%
• 1M: -7.82%
• YTD: -38.17%
• 6M: -41.55%
• 1Y: -50.68%
• 3Y*: -15.22%
• 5Y*: -31.44%
• 10Y*: —

BFAP

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: -9.01%
• YTD: -23.65%
• 6M: -23.58%
• 1Y: -28.52%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETCG vs. BFAP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ETCG Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC)	-38.17%	-4.81%
BFAP FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April	-23.65%	8.90%

Correlation

The correlation between ETCG and BFAP is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2025	0.65

The correlation between ETCG and BFAP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ETCG vs. BFAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETCG

ETCG Risk / Return Rank: 3
ETCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
ETCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
ETCG Omega Ratio Rank: 3
ETCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
ETCG Martin Ratio Rank: 4

BFAP

BFAP Risk / Return Rank: 1
BFAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
BFAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
BFAP Omega Ratio Rank: 1
BFAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BFAP Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETCG vs. BFAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC) (ETCG) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April (BFAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ETCG	BFAP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.82	-1.34	+0.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.28	-1.88	+0.60
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.86	0.78	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.74	-0.85	+0.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.09	-1.53	+0.44

ETCG vs. BFAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETCG Sharpe Ratio is -0.82, which is higher than the BFAP Sharpe Ratio of -1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETCG and BFAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ETCG vs. BFAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETCG drawdown since its inception was -96.59%, which is greater than BFAP's maximum drawdown of -33.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETCG and BFAP.

Drawdown Indicators

	ETCG	BFAP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.59%	-33.64%	-62.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-68.71%	-33.64%	-35.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-79.59%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-92.70%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-95.53%	-33.64%	-61.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-82.72%	-11.78%	-70.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	46.42%	18.63%	+27.79%

Volatility

ETCG vs. BFAP - Volatility Comparison

Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC) (ETCG) has a higher volatility of 11.97% compared to FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April (BFAP) at 5.33%. This indicates that ETCG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BFAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ETCG	BFAP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.97%	5.33%	+6.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	36.55%	16.77%	+19.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	62.06%	21.45%	+40.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	93.30%	20.46%	+72.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	114.95%	20.46%	+94.49%

ETCG vs. BFAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETCG has a 2.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BFAP's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

ETCG vs. BFAP - Dividend Comparison

ETCG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BFAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.85%.

Position	TTM	2025
BFAP FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April	24.85%	18.97%
ETCG Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC)	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ETCG and BFAP in my portfolio?

ETCG and BFAP have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ETCG or BFAP?

ETCG has higher volatility (11.97%) compared to BFAP (5.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETCG dropped -96.59% vs BFAP's -33.64%.

Which ETF is better, ETCG or BFAP?

On 1-year performance, BFAP leads with -28.52% vs -50.68% for ETCG. On fees, BFAP is cheaper at 0.90% per year. On volatility, BFAP has been the lower-risk option at 5.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ETCG or BFAP?

Over the 1-year period, BFAP has performed better with a -28.52% return vs -50.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ETCG or BFAP?

BFAP is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for ETCG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ETCG or BFAP?

BFAP has the higher dividend yield at 24.85%, compared with 0.00% for ETCG.

What is the main difference between ETCG and BFAP?

They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 2.50% for ETCG and 0.90% for BFAP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ETCG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.82 vs -1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.