BFAP vs. ETTY
BFAP (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April) and ETTY (Amplify Ethereum 3% Monthly Option Income ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.89 means they have usually moved in the same direction. BFAP charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ETTY.
Performance
BFAP vs. ETTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BFAP achieves a -22.20% return, which is significantly higher than ETTY's -37.27% return.
BFAP
- 1D
- -1.67%
- 1M
- 0.67%
- 6M
- -19.71%
- YTD
- -22.20%
- 1Y
- -29.23%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -11.78%
ETTY
- 1D
- -3.22%
- 1M
- 10.18%
- 6M
- -31.57%
- YTD
- -37.27%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $15.29K | $12.55K | $25.30K | |
| $42.12K | $34.64K | $65.57K |
BFAP vs. ETTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BFAP FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April | -22.20% | -12.56% |
ETTY Amplify Ethereum 3% Monthly Option Income ETF | -37.27% | -27.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between BFAP and ETTY is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025 | 0.89 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BFAP vs. ETTY — Risk / Return Rank
BFAP
ETTY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BFAP vs. ETTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April (BFAP) and Amplify Ethereum 3% Monthly Option Income ETF (ETTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BFAP | ETTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.88 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.42 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BFAP vs. ETTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BFAP drawdown since its inception was -34.15%, smaller than the maximum ETTY drawdown of -62.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFAP and ETTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BFAP | ETTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.15% | -62.13% | +27.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.15% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.39% | -54.72% | +22.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.30% | -39.04% | +25.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.18% | — | — |
Volatility
BFAP vs. ETTY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BFAP | ETTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.04% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.75% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.58% | 62.54% | -40.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.02% | 62.54% | -42.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.02% | 62.54% | -42.52% |
BFAP vs. ETTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
BFAP has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than ETTY's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
BFAP vs. ETTY - Dividend Comparison
BFAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.39%, less than ETTY's 40.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BFAP FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April | 24.39% | 18.97% |
ETTY Amplify Ethereum 3% Monthly Option Income ETF | 40.34% | 6.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BFAP and ETTY have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ETTY is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ETTY is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BFAP.
ETTY has the higher dividend yield at 40.34%, compared with 24.39% for BFAP.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for BFAP and 0.75% for ETTY.
Find the right allocation for BFAP and ETTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer