PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESQ vs. CCB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ESQ vs. CCB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Esquire Financial Holdings Inc (ESQ) and Coastal Financial Corporation (CCB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESQ achieves a 12.15% return, which is significantly higher than CCB's -37.11% return.


ESQ

1D
0.45%
1M
2.92%
YTD
12.15%
6M
7.57%
1Y
28.65%
3Y*
37.60%
5Y*
37.63%
10Y*

CCB

1D
0.57%
1M
3.45%
YTD
-37.11%
6M
-38.97%
1Y
-16.25%
3Y*
24.32%
5Y*
18.60%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESQ vs. CCB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ESQ
Esquire Financial Holdings Inc
12.15%29.37%60.89%16.72%38.33%64.15%-26.39%20.14%-16.51%
CCB
Coastal Financial Corporation
-37.11%34.95%91.20%-6.54%-6.12%141.05%27.50%8.14%-6.28%

Correlation

The correlation between ESQ and CCB is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2018

0.41

The correlation between ESQ and CCB shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (all time) to 0.58 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

ESQ:

$5.96

CCB:

$4.25

PE Ratio

ESQ:

19.14

CCB:

16.94

PEG Ratio

ESQ:

0.66

CCB:

1.72

PS Ratio

ESQ:

5.74

CCB:

1.98

Total Revenue (TTM)

ESQ:

$172.32M

CCB:

$422.59M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ESQ:

$147.99M

CCB:

$195.03M

EBITDA (TTM)

ESQ:

$71.96M

CCB:

$52.74M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESQ vs. CCB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESQ
ESQ Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
ESQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
ESQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

CCB
CCB Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
CCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCB Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
CCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCB Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESQ vs. CCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Esquire Financial Holdings Inc (ESQ) and Coastal Financial Corporation (CCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ESQCCBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

0.96

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

-0.38

+2.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.58

-0.72

+5.30

ESQ vs. CCB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is higher than the CCB Sharpe Ratio of -0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESQ and CCB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ESQ vs. CCB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESQ drawdown since its inception was -56.52%, which is greater than CCB's maximum drawdown of -50.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESQ and CCB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESQCCBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.52%

-50.22%

-6.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.42%

-42.99%

+27.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.68%

-42.99%

+22.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.78%

-42.99%

+18.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.06%

-39.43%

+37.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.73%

-14.76%

+4.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.27%

22.65%

-16.38%

Volatility

ESQ vs. CCB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Esquire Financial Holdings Inc (ESQ) is 7.23%, while Coastal Financial Corporation (CCB) has a volatility of 8.49%. This indicates that ESQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESQCCBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.23%

8.49%

-1.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.64%

30.45%

-5.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.80%

41.46%

-9.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.21%

38.36%

-7.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.54%

47.84%

-7.30%

Dividends

ESQ vs. CCB - Dividend Comparison

ESQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, while CCB has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
CCB
Coastal Financial Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ESQ
Esquire Financial Holdings Inc
0.66%0.69%0.75%0.95%0.65%

Financials

ESQ vs. CCB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Esquire Financial Holdings Inc and Coastal Financial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M20222023202420252026
45.49M
0
(ESQ) Total Revenue
(CCB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ESQ and CCB have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CCB has higher volatility (8.49%) compared to ESQ (7.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESQ dropped -56.52% vs CCB's -50.22%.

ESQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.91 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESQ and CCB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer