ESQ vs. BFC
ESQ (Esquire Financial Holdings Inc) and BFC (Bank First Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Banks - Regional industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 5 years, ESQ returned 35.09%/yr vs 16.88%/yr for BFC. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ESQ vs. BFC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESQ achieves a 6.30% return, which is significantly lower than BFC's 15.64% return.
ESQ
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- -0.69%
- YTD
- 6.30%
- 6M
- 4.57%
- 1Y
- 22.75%
- 3Y*
- 37.23%
- 5Y*
- 35.09%
- 10Y*
- —
BFC
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -3.71%
- YTD
- 15.64%
- 6M
- 8.85%
- 1Y
- 25.65%
- 3Y*
- 21.40%
- 5Y*
- 16.88%
- 10Y*
- 19.63%
ESQ vs. BFC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESQ Esquire Financial Holdings Inc | 6.30% | 29.37% | 60.89% | 16.72% | 38.33% | 64.15% | -26.39% | 20.14% | 9.93% | 29.44% |
BFC Bank First Corporation | 15.64% | 28.68% | 16.37% | -5.32% | 30.02% | 13.29% | -6.17% | 52.07% | 5.71% | 24.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESQ and BFC is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2017 | 0.37 |
Over the past year, ESQ and BFC have become more correlated (0.64) than their long-term average of 0.37, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
ESQ:
$940.42M
BFC:
$1.57B
ESQ:
$5.96
BFC:
$7.18
ESQ:
18.14
BFC:
19.54
ESQ:
0.63
BFC:
3.10
ESQ:
5.44
BFC:
5.41
ESQ:
3.12
BFC:
1.92
ESQ:
$172.32M
BFC:
$264.29M
ESQ:
$147.99M
BFC:
$191.50M
ESQ:
$71.96M
BFC:
$94.45M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESQ vs. BFC — Risk / Return Rank
ESQ
BFC
ESQ vs. BFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Esquire Financial Holdings Inc (ESQ) and Bank First Corporation (BFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESQ | BFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.18 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.48 | 1.82 | -0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.65 | 3.91 | -0.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESQ | BFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 | 0.94 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.13 | 0.62 | +0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.25 | +0.37 |
Drawdowns
ESQ vs. BFC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESQ drawdown since its inception was -56.52%, smaller than the maximum BFC drawdown of -82.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESQ and BFC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESQ | BFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.52% | -82.02% | +25.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.42% | -14.17% | -1.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.68% | -15.70% | -4.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.78% | -32.75% | +7.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.17% | -7.23% | +0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.72% | -27.18% | +16.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.25% | 6.58% | -0.33% |
Volatility
ESQ vs. BFC - Volatility Comparison
Esquire Financial Holdings Inc (ESQ) has a higher volatility of 7.96% compared to Bank First Corporation (BFC) at 5.76%. This indicates that ESQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESQ | BFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.96% | 5.76% | +2.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.40% | 16.91% | +7.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.61% | 27.38% | +4.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.23% | 27.23% | +4.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.59% | 30.31% | +10.28% |
Dividends
ESQ vs. BFC - Dividend Comparison
ESQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than BFC's 1.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BFC Bank First Corporation | 1.32% | 4.35% | 1.56% | 1.33% | 1.01% | 1.58% | 1.25% | 1.14% | 1.46% | 1.43% | 1.77% | 2.23% |
ESQ Esquire Financial Holdings Inc | 0.69% | 0.69% | 0.75% | 0.95% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
ESQ vs. BFC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Esquire Financial Holdings Inc and Bank First Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ESQ vs. BFC - Profitability Comparison
ESQ - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Esquire Financial Holdings Inc reported a gross profit of 40.46M and revenue of 45.49M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 88.9%.
BFC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bank First Corporation reported a gross profit of 63.91M and revenue of 84.30M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 75.8%.
ESQ - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Esquire Financial Holdings Inc reported an operating income of 17.10M and revenue of 45.49M, resulting in an operating margin of 37.6%.
BFC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bank First Corporation reported an operating income of 24.69M and revenue of 84.30M, resulting in an operating margin of 29.3%.
ESQ - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Esquire Financial Holdings Inc reported a net income of 12.21M and revenue of 45.49M, resulting in a net margin of 26.8%.
BFC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bank First Corporation reported a net income of 19.99M and revenue of 84.30M, resulting in a net margin of 23.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ESQ and BFC have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ESQ has higher volatility (7.96%) compared to BFC (5.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESQ dropped -56.52% vs BFC's -82.02%.
BFC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.94 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ESQ and BFC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer