PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESQ vs. BFC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ESQ vs. BFC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Esquire Financial Holdings Inc (ESQ) and Bank First Corporation (BFC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESQ achieves a 6.30% return, which is significantly lower than BFC's 15.64% return.


ESQ

1D
-0.49%
1M
-0.69%
YTD
6.30%
6M
4.57%
1Y
22.75%
3Y*
37.23%
5Y*
35.09%
10Y*

BFC

1D
0.31%
1M
-3.71%
YTD
15.64%
6M
8.85%
1Y
25.65%
3Y*
21.40%
5Y*
16.88%
10Y*
19.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESQ vs. BFC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ESQ
Esquire Financial Holdings Inc
6.30%29.37%60.89%16.72%38.33%64.15%-26.39%20.14%9.93%29.44%
BFC
Bank First Corporation
15.64%28.68%16.37%-5.32%30.02%13.29%-6.17%52.07%5.71%24.27%

Correlation

The correlation between ESQ and BFC is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2017

0.37

Over the past year, ESQ and BFC have become more correlated (0.64) than their long-term average of 0.37, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ESQ:

$940.42M

BFC:

$1.57B

EPS

ESQ:

$5.96

BFC:

$7.18

PE Ratio

ESQ:

18.14

BFC:

19.54

PEG Ratio

ESQ:

0.63

BFC:

3.10

PS Ratio

ESQ:

5.44

BFC:

5.41

PB Ratio

ESQ:

3.12

BFC:

1.92

Total Revenue (TTM)

ESQ:

$172.32M

BFC:

$264.29M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ESQ:

$147.99M

BFC:

$191.50M

EBITDA (TTM)

ESQ:

$71.96M

BFC:

$94.45M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESQ vs. BFC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESQ
ESQ Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
ESQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
ESQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

BFC
BFC Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
BFC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BFC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
BFC Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
BFC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
BFC Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESQ vs. BFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Esquire Financial Holdings Inc (ESQ) and Bank First Corporation (BFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESQBFCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.18

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.48

1.82

-0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.65

3.91

-0.26

ESQ vs. BFC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is comparable to the BFC Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESQ and BFC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESQBFCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

0.94

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.13

0.62

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.25

+0.37

Drawdowns

ESQ vs. BFC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESQ drawdown since its inception was -56.52%, smaller than the maximum BFC drawdown of -82.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESQ and BFC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESQBFCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.52%

-82.02%

+25.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.42%

-14.17%

-1.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.68%

-15.70%

-4.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.78%

-32.75%

+7.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.17%

-7.23%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.72%

-27.18%

+16.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.25%

6.58%

-0.33%

Volatility

ESQ vs. BFC - Volatility Comparison

Esquire Financial Holdings Inc (ESQ) has a higher volatility of 7.96% compared to Bank First Corporation (BFC) at 5.76%. This indicates that ESQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESQBFCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.96%

5.76%

+2.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.40%

16.91%

+7.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.61%

27.38%

+4.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.23%

27.23%

+4.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.59%

30.31%

+10.28%

Dividends

ESQ vs. BFC - Dividend Comparison

ESQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than BFC's 1.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BFC
Bank First Corporation
1.32%4.35%1.56%1.33%1.01%1.58%1.25%1.14%1.46%1.43%1.77%2.23%
ESQ
Esquire Financial Holdings Inc
0.69%0.69%0.75%0.95%0.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ESQ vs. BFC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Esquire Financial Holdings Inc and Bank First Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


20.00M30.00M40.00M50.00M60.00M70.00M80.00M20222023202420252026
45.49M
84.30M
(ESQ) Total Revenue
(BFC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ESQ vs. BFC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Esquire Financial Holdings Inc and Bank First Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
88.9%
75.8%
Portfolio components
ESQ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Esquire Financial Holdings Inc reported a gross profit of 40.46M and revenue of 45.49M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 88.9%.

BFC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bank First Corporation reported a gross profit of 63.91M and revenue of 84.30M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 75.8%.

ESQ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Esquire Financial Holdings Inc reported an operating income of 17.10M and revenue of 45.49M, resulting in an operating margin of 37.6%.

BFC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bank First Corporation reported an operating income of 24.69M and revenue of 84.30M, resulting in an operating margin of 29.3%.

ESQ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Esquire Financial Holdings Inc reported a net income of 12.21M and revenue of 45.49M, resulting in a net margin of 26.8%.

BFC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bank First Corporation reported a net income of 19.99M and revenue of 84.30M, resulting in a net margin of 23.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ESQ and BFC have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ESQ has higher volatility (7.96%) compared to BFC (5.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESQ dropped -56.52% vs BFC's -82.02%.

BFC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.94 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESQ and BFC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer