PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESPS.L vs. CPJ1.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESPS.L vs. CPJ1.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESPS.L) and iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc (CPJ1.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESPS.L achieves a 7.41% return, which is significantly lower than CPJ1.L's 9.49% return.


ESPS.L

1D
-0.43%
1M
0.59%
YTD
7.41%
6M
8.29%
1Y
16.01%
3Y*
9.70%
5Y*
6.22%
10Y*

CPJ1.L

1D
-0.71%
1M
1.08%
YTD
9.49%
6M
10.43%
1Y
18.82%
3Y*
10.84%
5Y*
6.13%
10Y*
8.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESPS.L vs. CPJ1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ESPS.L
Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc
7.41%10.52%7.35%2.26%1.34%5.87%
CPJ1.L
iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc
9.49%12.05%6.89%0.15%4.86%3.60%

Correlation

The correlation between ESPS.L and CPJ1.L is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2021

0.53

Over the past year, ESPS.L and CPJ1.L have become more correlated (0.96) than their long-term average of 0.53, meaning their price movements have been converging.

ESPS.L vs. CPJ1.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ESPS.L
CPJ1.L

Financial Services

50.7%
45.5%

Basic Materials

11.6%
15.5%

Real Estate

7.8%
7.9%

Industrials

7.2%
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

6.8%
6.1%

Healthcare

4.0%
3.2%

Energy

3.0%
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

2.6%
2.9%

Communication Services

2.6%
2.9%

Utilities

2.2%
3.6%

Technology

1.4%
1.1%

Financial Services

ESPS.L
50.7%
CPJ1.L
45.5%

Basic Materials

ESPS.L
11.6%
CPJ1.L
15.5%

Real Estate

ESPS.L
7.8%
CPJ1.L
7.9%

Industrials

ESPS.L
7.2%
CPJ1.L
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

ESPS.L
6.8%
CPJ1.L
6.1%

Healthcare

ESPS.L
4.0%
CPJ1.L
3.2%

Energy

ESPS.L
3.0%
CPJ1.L
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

ESPS.L
2.6%
CPJ1.L
2.9%

Communication Services

ESPS.L
2.6%
CPJ1.L
2.9%

Utilities

ESPS.L
2.2%
CPJ1.L
3.6%

Technology

ESPS.L
1.4%
CPJ1.L
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESPS.L vs. CPJ1.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESPS.L
ESPS.L Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
ESPS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESPS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESPS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
ESPS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESPS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

CPJ1.L
CPJ1.L Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
CPJ1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPJ1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPJ1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
CPJ1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPJ1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESPS.L vs. CPJ1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESPS.L) and iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc (CPJ1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESPS.LCPJ1.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.31

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

2.59

-0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.09

7.85

-1.75

ESPS.L vs. CPJ1.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESPS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the CPJ1.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESPS.L and CPJ1.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESPS.LCPJ1.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.47

1.71

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.45

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.46

+0.22

Drawdowns

ESPS.L vs. CPJ1.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESPS.L drawdown since its inception was -17.76%, smaller than the maximum CPJ1.L drawdown of -32.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESPS.L and CPJ1.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESPS.LCPJ1.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.76%

-32.49%

+14.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.52%

-7.23%

-0.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.76%

-17.15%

-0.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.76%

-17.61%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.28%

-2.39%

-0.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.55%

-6.90%

+2.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

2.39%

+0.23%

Volatility

ESPS.L vs. CPJ1.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESPS.L) and iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc (CPJ1.L) have volatilities of 3.47% and 3.64%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESPS.LCPJ1.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.47%

3.64%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.32%

8.62%

-0.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.81%

10.97%

-0.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.87%

13.74%

+5.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.87%

15.93%

+2.94%

ESPS.L vs. CPJ1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESPS.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than CPJ1.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ESPS.L vs. CPJ1.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ESPS.L nor CPJ1.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, ESPS.L and CPJ1.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, ESPS.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ESPS.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for CPJ1.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ESPS.L and 0.20% for CPJ1.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESPS.L and CPJ1.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer