ESPS.L vs. CPJ1.L
ESPS.L (Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc) and CPJ1.L (iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds tracking the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD, from Invesco and iShares respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ESPS.L returned 6.22%/yr vs 6.13%/yr for CPJ1.L. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ESPS.L charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for CPJ1.L.
Performance
ESPS.L vs. CPJ1.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESPS.L achieves a 7.41% return, which is significantly lower than CPJ1.L's 9.49% return.
ESPS.L
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- YTD
- 7.41%
- 6M
- 8.29%
- 1Y
- 16.01%
- 3Y*
- 9.70%
- 5Y*
- 6.22%
- 10Y*
- —
CPJ1.L
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- 1.08%
- YTD
- 9.49%
- 6M
- 10.43%
- 1Y
- 18.82%
- 3Y*
- 10.84%
- 5Y*
- 6.13%
- 10Y*
- 8.85%
ESPS.L vs. CPJ1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESPS.L Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc | 7.41% | 10.52% | 7.35% | 2.26% | 1.34% | 5.87% |
CPJ1.L iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc | 9.49% | 12.05% | 6.89% | 0.15% | 4.86% | 3.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESPS.L and CPJ1.L is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2021 | 0.53 |
Over the past year, ESPS.L and CPJ1.L have become more correlated (0.96) than their long-term average of 0.53, meaning their price movements have been converging.
ESPS.L vs. CPJ1.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ESPS.L
CPJ1.L
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Technology
Financial Services
ESPS.L
CPJ1.L
Basic Materials
ESPS.L
CPJ1.L
Real Estate
ESPS.L
CPJ1.L
Industrials
ESPS.L
CPJ1.L
Consumer Cyclical
ESPS.L
CPJ1.L
Healthcare
ESPS.L
CPJ1.L
Energy
ESPS.L
CPJ1.L
Consumer Defensive
ESPS.L
CPJ1.L
Communication Services
ESPS.L
CPJ1.L
Utilities
ESPS.L
CPJ1.L
Technology
ESPS.L
CPJ1.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESPS.L vs. CPJ1.L — Risk / Return Rank
ESPS.L
CPJ1.L
ESPS.L vs. CPJ1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESPS.L) and iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc (CPJ1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESPS.L | CPJ1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.31 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.12 | 2.59 | -0.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.09 | 7.85 | -1.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESPS.L | CPJ1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.47 | 1.71 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.45 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.46 | +0.22 |
Drawdowns
ESPS.L vs. CPJ1.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESPS.L drawdown since its inception was -17.76%, smaller than the maximum CPJ1.L drawdown of -32.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESPS.L and CPJ1.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESPS.L | CPJ1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.76% | -32.49% | +14.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.52% | -7.23% | -0.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.76% | -17.15% | -0.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.76% | -17.61% | -0.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.49% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.28% | -2.39% | -0.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.55% | -6.90% | +2.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.62% | 2.39% | +0.23% |
Volatility
ESPS.L vs. CPJ1.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESPS.L) and iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc (CPJ1.L) have volatilities of 3.47% and 3.64%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESPS.L | CPJ1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.47% | 3.64% | -0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.32% | 8.62% | -0.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.81% | 10.97% | -0.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.87% | 13.74% | +5.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.87% | 15.93% | +2.94% |
ESPS.L vs. CPJ1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESPS.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than CPJ1.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ESPS.L vs. CPJ1.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ESPS.L nor CPJ1.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, ESPS.L and CPJ1.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, ESPS.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ESPS.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for CPJ1.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ESPS.L and 0.20% for CPJ1.L.
Find the right allocation for ESPS.L and CPJ1.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer