ESPS.L vs. IGDA.L
ESPS.L (Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc) and IGDA.L (Invesco Dow Jones Islamic Global Developed Markets UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - ESPS.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD, while IGDA.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Islamic Market Developed Markets Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ESPS.L returned 9.70%/yr vs 18.64%/yr for IGDA.L. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ESPS.L charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for IGDA.L.
Performance
ESPS.L vs. IGDA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ESPS.L is traded in GBp, while IGDA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IGDA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESPS.L achieves a 7.41% return, which is significantly lower than IGDA.L's 16.46% return.
ESPS.L
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- YTD
- 7.41%
- 6M
- 8.29%
- 1Y
- 16.01%
- 3Y*
- 9.70%
- 5Y*
- 6.22%
- 10Y*
- —
IGDA.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 8.96%
- YTD
- 16.46%
- 6M
- 16.36%
- 1Y
- 37.83%
- 3Y*
- 18.64%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ESPS.L vs. IGDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESPS.L Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc | 7.41% | 10.52% | 7.35% | 2.26% | 2.97% |
IGDA.L Invesco Dow Jones Islamic Global Developed Markets UCITS ETF USD Acc | 16.03% | 10.28% | 20.00% | 23.23% | -5.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESPS.L and IGDA.L is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2022 | 0.33 |
The correlation between ESPS.L and IGDA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (all time) to 0.52 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ESPS.L vs. IGDA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ESPS.L
IGDA.L
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Technology
Financial Services
ESPS.L
IGDA.L
Basic Materials
ESPS.L
IGDA.L
Real Estate
ESPS.L
IGDA.L
Industrials
ESPS.L
IGDA.L
Consumer Cyclical
ESPS.L
IGDA.L
Healthcare
ESPS.L
IGDA.L
Energy
ESPS.L
IGDA.L
Consumer Defensive
ESPS.L
IGDA.L
Communication Services
ESPS.L
IGDA.L
Utilities
ESPS.L
IGDA.L
Technology
ESPS.L
IGDA.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESPS.L vs. IGDA.L — Risk / Return Rank
ESPS.L
IGDA.L
ESPS.L vs. IGDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESPS.L) and Invesco Dow Jones Islamic Global Developed Markets UCITS ETF USD Acc (IGDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESPS.L | IGDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.50 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.12 | 5.23 | -3.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.09 | 18.72 | -12.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESPS.L | IGDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.47 | 2.76 | -1.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.92 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
ESPS.L vs. IGDA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESPS.L drawdown since its inception was -17.76%, smaller than the maximum IGDA.L drawdown of -22.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESPS.L and IGDA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESPS.L | IGDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.76% | -22.43% | +4.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.52% | -7.20% | -0.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.76% | -22.43% | +4.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.76% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.28% | 0.00% | -3.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.55% | -3.93% | -0.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.62% | 2.02% | +0.60% |
Volatility
ESPS.L vs. IGDA.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESPS.L) is 3.47%, while Invesco Dow Jones Islamic Global Developed Markets UCITS ETF USD Acc (IGDA.L) has a volatility of 4.45%. This indicates that ESPS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESPS.L | IGDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.47% | 4.45% | -0.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.32% | 10.27% | -1.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.81% | 13.66% | -2.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.87% | 17.32% | +1.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.87% | 17.32% | +1.55% |
ESPS.L vs. IGDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESPS.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than IGDA.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESPS.L vs. IGDA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ESPS.L nor IGDA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ESPS.L and IGDA.L have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ESPS.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ESPS.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IGDA.L.
ESPS.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while IGDA.L is Global Equities. ESPS.L tracks MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD, while IGDA.L tracks Dow Jones Islamic Market Developed Markets Index. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ESPS.L and 0.40% for IGDA.L.
Find the right allocation for ESPS.L and IGDA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer