ESPO vs. SGRT
ESPO (VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF) and SGRT (SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. ESPO is passively managed, while SGRT is actively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ESPO charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for SGRT.
Performance
ESPO vs. SGRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESPO achieves a -13.31% return, which is significantly lower than SGRT's 51.46% return.
ESPO
- 1D
- -2.20%
- 1M
- -1.23%
- YTD
- -13.31%
- 6M
- -16.99%
- 1Y
- -11.55%
- 3Y*
- 19.46%
- 5Y*
- 6.23%
- 10Y*
- —
SGRT
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 14.68%
- YTD
- 51.46%
- 6M
- 56.17%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ESPO vs. SGRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ESPO VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF | -13.31% | -6.97% |
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF | 51.46% | 25.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESPO and SGRT is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESPO vs. SGRT — Risk / Return Rank
ESPO
SGRT
ESPO vs. SGRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESPO | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.42 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.76 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESPO | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.62 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 3.81 | -3.17 |
Drawdowns
ESPO vs. SGRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESPO drawdown since its inception was -50.99%, which is greater than SGRT's maximum drawdown of -17.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESPO and SGRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESPO | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.99% | -17.87% | -33.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.81% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.81% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.33% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.66% | 0.00% | -25.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.03% | -3.11% | -11.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.30% | — | — |
Volatility
ESPO vs. SGRT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESPO | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.00% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.58% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.85% | 33.41% | -14.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.12% | 33.41% | -8.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.75% | 33.41% | -7.66% |
ESPO vs. SGRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESPO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than SGRT's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESPO vs. SGRT - Dividend Comparison
ESPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, more than SGRT's 0.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESPO VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF | 1.44% | 1.24% | 0.44% | 0.96% | 0.91% | 3.36% | 0.12% | 0.22% | 0.04% |
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF | 0.11% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESPO and SGRT have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ESPO is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ESPO is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for SGRT.
ESPO has the higher dividend yield at 1.44%, compared with 0.11% for SGRT.
Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ESPO and 0.59% for SGRT.
Find the right allocation for ESPO and SGRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer