ESPO vs. GDX
ESPO (VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF) and GDX (VanEck Gold Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ESPO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index, while GDX is a Gold fund tracking the NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ESPO returned 6.23%/yr vs 18.69%/yr for GDX. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ESPO charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for GDX.
Performance
ESPO vs. GDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESPO achieves a -13.31% return, which is significantly lower than GDX's -0.90% return.
ESPO
- 1D
- -2.20%
- 1M
- -1.23%
- YTD
- -13.31%
- 6M
- -16.99%
- 1Y
- -11.55%
- 3Y*
- 19.46%
- 5Y*
- 6.23%
- 10Y*
- —
GDX
- 1D
- -3.46%
- 1M
- -0.76%
- YTD
- -0.90%
- 6M
- 5.62%
- 1Y
- 61.27%
- 3Y*
- 41.00%
- 5Y*
- 18.69%
- 10Y*
- 13.98%
ESPO vs. GDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESPO VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF | -13.31% | 25.79% | 47.61% | 33.64% | -34.71% | -2.13% | 83.93% | 42.36% | -12.57% |
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | -0.90% | 154.77% | 10.63% | 9.98% | -9.01% | -9.52% | 23.66% | 39.84% | 6.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESPO and GDX is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2018 | 0.25 |
ESPO vs. GDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ESPO
GDX
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Communication Services
ESPO
GDX
-
Consumer Cyclical
ESPO
GDX
-
Technology
ESPO
GDX
-
Basic Materials
ESPO
-
GDX
Consumer Defensive
ESPO
-
GDX
-
Energy
ESPO
-
GDX
-
Financial Services
ESPO
-
GDX
-
Healthcare
ESPO
-
GDX
-
Industrials
ESPO
-
GDX
-
Real Estate
ESPO
-
GDX
-
Utilities
ESPO
-
GDX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESPO vs. GDX — Risk / Return Rank
ESPO
GDX
ESPO vs. GDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESPO | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.25 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.42 | 2.00 | -2.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.76 | 5.13 | -5.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESPO | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.62 | 1.35 | -1.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.52 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.13 | +0.51 |
Drawdowns
ESPO vs. GDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESPO drawdown since its inception was -50.99%, smaller than the maximum GDX drawdown of -80.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESPO and GDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESPO | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.99% | -80.34% | +29.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.81% | -30.84% | +3.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.81% | -30.84% | +3.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.33% | -46.51% | -1.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -49.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.66% | -26.62% | +0.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.03% | -40.43% | +25.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.30% | 11.99% | +3.31% |
Volatility
ESPO vs. GDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) is 5.00%, while VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) has a volatility of 15.40%. This indicates that ESPO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESPO | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.00% | 15.40% | -10.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.58% | 37.50% | -22.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.85% | 45.49% | -26.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.12% | 36.39% | -11.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.75% | 37.18% | -11.43% |
ESPO vs. GDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESPO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than GDX's 0.51% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESPO vs. GDX - Dividend Comparison
ESPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, more than GDX's 0.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESPO VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF | 1.44% | 1.24% | 0.44% | 0.96% | 0.91% | 3.36% | 0.12% | 0.22% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | 0.74% | 0.74% | 1.19% | 1.61% | 1.66% | 1.67% | 0.53% | 0.67% | 0.50% | 0.76% | 0.26% | 0.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESPO and GDX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDX has higher volatility (15.40%) compared to ESPO (5.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESPO dropped -50.99% vs GDX's -80.34%.
On 5-year performance, GDX leads with 18.69% vs 6.23% for ESPO. On fees, GDX is cheaper at 0.51% per year. On volatility, ESPO has been the lower-risk option at 5.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GDX has performed better with a 18.69% return vs 6.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GDX is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ESPO.
ESPO has the higher dividend yield at 1.44%, compared with 0.74% for GDX.
ESPO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while GDX is Gold. ESPO tracks MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index, while GDX tracks NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ESPO and 0.51% for GDX.
GDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ESPO and GDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer