ESPJ.L vs. PAXG.L
ESPJ.L (Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc) and PAXG.L (Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - ESPJ.L tracks the MSCI Pacific ex Japan Universal Select Business Screens Index while PAXG.L tracks the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ESPJ.L returned 4.51%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for PAXG.L. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ESPJ.L charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for PAXG.L.
Performance
ESPJ.L vs. PAXG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ESPJ.L is traded in USD, while PAXG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the PAXG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESPJ.L achieves a 6.36% return, which is significantly lower than PAXG.L's 8.57% return.
ESPJ.L
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- -0.91%
- YTD
- 6.36%
- 6M
- 7.75%
- 1Y
- 13.44%
- 3Y*
- 12.26%
- 5Y*
- 4.51%
- 10Y*
- —
PAXG.L
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- -0.41%
- YTD
- 8.57%
- 6M
- 6.77%
- 1Y
- 12.62%
- 3Y*
- 8.78%
- 5Y*
- 0.86%
- 10Y*
- —
ESPJ.L vs. PAXG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESPJ.L Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc | 6.36% | 18.97% | 5.95% | 5.75% | -7.36% | 1.74% |
PAXG.L Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS | 8.57% | 16.83% | -0.21% | 2.59% | -10.69% | -3.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESPJ.L and PAXG.L is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2021 | 0.59 |
Over the past year, ESPJ.L and PAXG.L have become more correlated (0.90) than their long-term average of 0.59, meaning their price movements have been converging.
ESPJ.L vs. PAXG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ESPJ.L
PAXG.L
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Technology
Financial Services
ESPJ.L
PAXG.L
Basic Materials
ESPJ.L
PAXG.L
Real Estate
ESPJ.L
PAXG.L
Industrials
ESPJ.L
PAXG.L
Consumer Cyclical
ESPJ.L
PAXG.L
Healthcare
ESPJ.L
PAXG.L
Energy
ESPJ.L
PAXG.L
Consumer Defensive
ESPJ.L
PAXG.L
Communication Services
ESPJ.L
PAXG.L
Utilities
ESPJ.L
PAXG.L
Technology
ESPJ.L
PAXG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESPJ.L vs. PAXG.L — Risk / Return Rank
ESPJ.L
PAXG.L
ESPJ.L vs. PAXG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESPJ.L) and Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS (PAXG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESPJ.L | PAXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.17 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.54 | 1.39 | +0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.71 | 3.96 | +0.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESPJ.L | PAXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 | 0.94 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.06 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.32 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
ESPJ.L vs. PAXG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESPJ.L drawdown since its inception was -24.49%, smaller than the maximum PAXG.L drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESPJ.L and PAXG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESPJ.L | PAXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.49% | -37.04% | +12.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.66% | -9.02% | +0.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.13% | -23.28% | +4.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.49% | -29.56% | +5.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.22% | -3.57% | -0.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.91% | -11.15% | +4.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.84% | 3.18% | -0.34% |
Volatility
ESPJ.L vs. PAXG.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESPJ.L) has a higher volatility of 4.45% compared to Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS (PAXG.L) at 4.10%. This indicates that ESPJ.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAXG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESPJ.L | PAXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.45% | 4.10% | +0.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.75% | 10.91% | -0.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.42% | 13.37% | +0.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.90% | 21.69% | -4.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.77% | 26.87% | -10.10% |
ESPJ.L vs. PAXG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESPJ.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than PAXG.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ESPJ.L vs. PAXG.L - Dividend Comparison
ESPJ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PAXG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESPJ.L Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PAXG.L Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.06% | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.03% | 0.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESPJ.L and PAXG.L have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PAXG.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PAXG.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for ESPJ.L.
ESPJ.L tracks MSCI Pacific ex Japan Universal Select Business Screens Index, while PAXG.L tracks MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ESPJ.L and 0.12% for PAXG.L.
Find the right allocation for ESPJ.L and PAXG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer