PAXG.L vs. LCCN.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS (PAXG.L) and Lyxor MSCI China UCITS ETF - Acc (LCCN.L).
PAXG.L and LCCN.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PAXG.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. It was launched on Apr 29, 2015. LCCN.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI China NR USD. It was launched on Jul 5, 2018. Both PAXG.L and LCCN.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PAXG.L or LCCN.L.
Key characteristics
| PAXG.L | LCCN.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 9.89% | 29.62% |
| 1Y Return | 17.71% | 24.58% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 8.03% | -5.96% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 10.58% | -0.84% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.29 | 0.90 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.91 | 1.49 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.24 | 1.18 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.18 | 0.42 |
| Martin Ratio | 6.79 | 2.51 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.74% | 10.10% |
| Daily Std Dev | 13.56% | 28.15% |
| Max Drawdown | -30.13% | -62.38% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.20% | -41.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between PAXG.L and LCCN.L is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
PAXG.L vs. LCCN.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, PAXG.L achieves a 9.89% return, which is significantly lower than LCCN.L's 29.62% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PAXG.L vs. LCCN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
PAXG.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than LCCN.L's 0.29% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PAXG.L vs. LCCN.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS (PAXG.L) and Lyxor MSCI China UCITS ETF - Acc (LCCN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PAXG.L vs. LCCN.L - Dividend Comparison
PAXG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.67%, while LCCN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAXG.L Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS | 3.67% | 4.03% | 4.47% | 3.74% | 2.81% | 4.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LCCN.L Lyxor MSCI China UCITS ETF - Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PAXG.L vs. LCCN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAXG.L drawdown since its inception was -30.13%, smaller than the maximum LCCN.L drawdown of -62.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAXG.L and LCCN.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PAXG.L vs. LCCN.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS (PAXG.L) is 4.80%, while Lyxor MSCI China UCITS ETF - Acc (LCCN.L) has a volatility of 10.83%. This indicates that PAXG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LCCN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.