PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESN vs. UNOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESN vs. UNOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Essential 40 Stock ETF (ESN) and Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November (UNOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESN achieves a 13.17% return, which is significantly higher than UNOV's 4.50% return.


ESN

1D
-1.55%
1M
2.19%
YTD
13.17%
6M
13.13%
1Y
26.33%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

UNOV

1D
-1.00%
1M
0.30%
YTD
4.50%
6M
4.55%
1Y
13.07%
3Y*
9.84%
5Y*
6.49%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESN vs. UNOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ESN
Essential 40 Stock ETF
13.17%16.52%-2.98%
UNOV
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November
4.50%9.92%1.85%

Correlation

The correlation between ESN and UNOV is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2024

0.72

The correlation between ESN and UNOV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESN vs. UNOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESN
ESN Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
ESN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESN Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
ESN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESN Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

UNOV
UNOV Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
UNOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UNOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
UNOV Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
UNOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
UNOV Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESN vs. UNOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Essential 40 Stock ETF (ESN) and Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November (UNOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESNUNOVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.47

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.12

2.90

+1.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.39

14.09

+2.30

ESN vs. UNOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESN Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is comparable to the UNOV Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESN and UNOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESNUNOVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.67

2.32

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.24

0.90

+0.35

Drawdowns

ESN vs. UNOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESN drawdown since its inception was -13.60%, roughly equal to the maximum UNOV drawdown of -13.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESN and UNOV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESNUNOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.60%

-13.84%

+0.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.42%

-4.52%

-1.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.84%

-1.07%

-0.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.87%

-1.66%

-0.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

0.93%

+0.68%

Volatility

ESN vs. UNOV - Volatility Comparison

Essential 40 Stock ETF (ESN) has a higher volatility of 2.97% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November (UNOV) at 1.44%. This indicates that ESN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UNOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESNUNOVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.97%

1.44%

+1.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.24%

4.79%

+2.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.90%

5.68%

+4.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.33%

6.84%

+6.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.33%

7.72%

+5.61%

ESN vs. UNOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESN has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than UNOV's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

ESN vs. UNOV - Dividend Comparison

ESN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, while UNOV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
ESN
Essential 40 Stock ETF
0.80%0.91%0.76%
UNOV
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ESN and UNOV have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ESN has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to UNOV (1.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESN dropped -13.60% vs UNOV's -13.84%.

On 1-year performance, ESN leads with 26.33% vs 13.07% for UNOV. On fees, ESN is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, UNOV has been the lower-risk option at 1.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ESN has performed better with a 26.33% return vs 13.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ESN is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for UNOV.

ESN has the higher dividend yield at 0.80%, compared with 0.00% for UNOV.

ESN tracks Essential 40 Stock Index, while UNOV tracks Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect November Series Index. They also come from different issuers: KKM Financial and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for ESN and 0.79% for UNOV.

ESN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESN and UNOV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer