ESIX vs. REGL
ESIX (SPDR S&P SmallCap 600 ESG ETF) and REGL (ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ESIX is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 ESG Index, while REGL is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ESIX returned 14.39%/yr vs 10.42%/yr for REGL. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ESIX charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for REGL.
Performance
ESIX vs. REGL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESIX achieves a 10.83% return, which is significantly higher than REGL's 3.98% return.
ESIX
- 1D
- -1.16%
- 1M
- -0.56%
- YTD
- 10.83%
- 6M
- 9.86%
- 1Y
- 22.21%
- 3Y*
- 14.39%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
REGL
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- -2.06%
- YTD
- 3.98%
- 6M
- 4.90%
- 1Y
- 9.25%
- 3Y*
- 10.42%
- 5Y*
- 5.92%
- 10Y*
- 9.12%
ESIX vs. REGL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESIX SPDR S&P SmallCap 600 ESG ETF | 10.83% | 1.83% | 9.66% | 17.51% | -14.62% |
REGL ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 3.98% | 6.89% | 12.26% | 5.41% | -0.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESIX and REGL is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2022 | 0.87 |
The correlation between ESIX and REGL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
ESIX vs. REGL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ESIX
REGL
Industrials
Financial Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
-
Utilities
Industrials
ESIX
REGL
Financial Services
ESIX
REGL
Technology
ESIX
REGL
Consumer Cyclical
ESIX
REGL
Healthcare
ESIX
REGL
Real Estate
ESIX
REGL
Energy
ESIX
REGL
Basic Materials
ESIX
REGL
Consumer Defensive
ESIX
REGL
Communication Services
ESIX
REGL
-
Utilities
ESIX
REGL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESIX vs. REGL — Risk / Return Rank
ESIX
REGL
ESIX vs. REGL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P SmallCap 600 ESG ETF (ESIX) and ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESIX | REGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.13 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.08 | 0.96 | +1.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.57 | 3.07 | +3.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESIX | REGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.20 | 0.70 | +0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.52 | -0.29 |
Drawdowns
ESIX vs. REGL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESIX drawdown since its inception was -27.56%, smaller than the maximum REGL drawdown of -36.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESIX and REGL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESIX | REGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.56% | -36.37% | +8.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.18% | -9.67% | -0.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.56% | -16.96% | -10.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.42% | -5.82% | +3.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.59% | -4.08% | -4.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.22% | 3.02% | +0.20% |
Volatility
ESIX vs. REGL - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P SmallCap 600 ESG ETF (ESIX) has a higher volatility of 4.19% compared to ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL) at 3.65%. This indicates that ESIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than REGL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESIX | REGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.19% | 3.65% | +0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.40% | 9.23% | +3.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.99% | 13.22% | +4.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.53% | 16.11% | +5.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.53% | 18.33% | +3.20% |
ESIX vs. REGL - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESIX has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than REGL's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESIX vs. REGL - Dividend Comparison
ESIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, less than REGL's 2.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESIX SPDR S&P SmallCap 600 ESG ETF | 1.45% | 1.64% | 1.65% | 1.69% | 1.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
REGL ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 2.24% | 2.32% | 2.28% | 2.40% | 2.32% | 2.50% | 2.41% | 1.96% | 2.09% | 1.63% | 1.20% | 1.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESIX and REGL have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ESIX has higher volatility (4.19%) compared to REGL (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESIX dropped -27.56% vs REGL's -36.37%.
On 3-year performance, ESIX leads with 14.39% vs 10.42% for REGL. On fees, ESIX is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, REGL has been the lower-risk option at 3.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, ESIX has performed better with a 14.39% return vs 10.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ESIX is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for REGL.
REGL has the higher dividend yield at 2.24%, compared with 1.45% for ESIX.
ESIX is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while REGL is Mid Cap Value Equities. ESIX tracks S&P SmallCap 600 ESG Index, while REGL tracks S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for ESIX and 0.40% for REGL.
ESIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ESIX and REGL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer