ESIM vs. CIL
ESIM (Eventide International ETF) and CIL (VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. ESIM is actively managed, while CIL is passively managed. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ESIM charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for CIL.
Performance
ESIM vs. CIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESIM achieves a 15.60% return, which is significantly higher than CIL's 5.44% return.
ESIM
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 2.21%
- YTD
- 15.60%
- 6M
- 15.29%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CIL
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 5.44%
- 6M
- 5.21%
- 1Y
- 16.11%
- 3Y*
- 15.96%
- 5Y*
- 7.55%
- 10Y*
- 8.21%
ESIM vs. CIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ESIM Eventide International ETF | 15.60% | 1.26% |
CIL VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF | 5.44% | 1.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESIM and CIL is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2025 | 0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESIM vs. CIL — Risk / Return Rank
ESIM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CIL
ESIM vs. CIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eventide International ETF (ESIM) and VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ESIM | CIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.51 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.66 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 15.90 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ESIM vs. CIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESIM drawdown since its inception was -11.26%, smaller than the maximum CIL drawdown of -36.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESIM and CIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESIM | CIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.26% | -36.27% | +25.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.29% | -0.58% | -2.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.17% | -6.52% | +4.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.07% | — |
Volatility
ESIM vs. CIL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESIM | CIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.00% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.36% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.14% | 7.63% | +9.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.14% | 16.47% | +0.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.14% | 17.07% | +0.07% |
ESIM vs. CIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESIM has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than CIL's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESIM vs. CIL - Dividend Comparison
ESIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than CIL's 1.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIL VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF | 1.20% | 2.70% | 3.46% | 2.91% | 2.41% | 3.04% | 1.73% | 2.69% | 2.85% | 2.17% | 2.34% | 0.43% |
ESIM Eventide International ETF | 0.19% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESIM and CIL have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CIL is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CIL is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for ESIM.
CIL has the higher dividend yield at 1.20%, compared with 0.19% for ESIM.
They also come from different issuers: Eventide and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for ESIM and 0.45% for CIL.
Find the right allocation for ESIM and CIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer