ESHY vs. ASHS
ESHY (Xtrackers J.P. Morgan ESG USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and ASHS (Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ESHY is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the JPMorgan ESG DM Corporate High Yield USD Index, while ASHS is a China Equities fund tracking the CSI 500 Index. Both are passively managed. ESHY charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ASHS.
Performance
ESHY vs. ASHS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ESHY
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ASHS
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -0.19%
- YTD
- 15.10%
- 6M
- 23.90%
- 1Y
- 57.65%
- 3Y*
- 13.41%
- 5Y*
- 3.97%
- 10Y*
- 3.27%
ESHY vs. ASHS - Yearly Performance Comparison
ESHY vs. ASHS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ESHY
ASHS
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Energy
ESHY
ASHS
Basic Materials
ESHY
-
ASHS
Communication Services
ESHY
-
ASHS
Consumer Cyclical
ESHY
-
ASHS
Consumer Defensive
ESHY
-
ASHS
Financial Services
ESHY
-
ASHS
Healthcare
ESHY
-
ASHS
Industrials
ESHY
-
ASHS
Real Estate
ESHY
-
ASHS
Technology
ESHY
-
ASHS
Utilities
ESHY
-
ASHS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESHY vs. ASHS — Risk / Return Rank
ESHY
ASHS
ESHY vs. ASHS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers J.P. Morgan ESG USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (ESHY) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESHY | ASHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.15 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.13 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.19 | — |
Drawdowns
ESHY vs. ASHS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESHY drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum ASHS drawdown of -69.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESHY and ASHS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESHY | ASHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -69.90% | +69.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -34.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -47.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -33.57% | +33.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -48.57% | +48.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.21% | — |
Volatility
ESHY vs. ASHS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESHY | ASHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.33% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 17.00% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 22.59% | -22.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 26.46% | -26.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 25.57% | -25.57% |
ESHY vs. ASHS - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESHY has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than ASHS's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESHY vs. ASHS - Dividend Comparison
Neither ESHY nor ASHS has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASHS Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.69% | 0.65% | 1.90% | 0.76% | 0.43% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.34% |
ESHY Xtrackers J.P. Morgan ESG USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, ESHY is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ESHY is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ASHS.
ESHY and ASHS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
ESHY is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while ASHS is China Equities. ESHY tracks JPMorgan ESG DM Corporate High Yield USD Index, while ASHS tracks CSI 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ESHY and 0.65% for ASHS.
Find the right allocation for ESHY and ASHS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer