PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESGN vs. SPDG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESGN vs. SPDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Sustainable International Equity Income ETF (ESGN) and SPDR Portfolio S&P Sector Neutral Dividend ETF (SPDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESGN achieves a 12.31% return, which is significantly lower than SPDG's 14.79% return.


ESGN

1D
0.19%
1M
5.03%
6M
6.69%
YTD
12.31%
1Y
29.04%
3Y*
21.02%
5Y*
13.47%
10Y*
10.05%
ALL TIME*
10.17%

SPDG

1D
0.49%
1M
-0.29%
6M
6.75%
YTD
14.79%
1Y
25.12%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
19.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$574.94K$759.83K$688.70K
$47.62K$41.21K$36.93K

ESGN vs. SPDG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ESGN
Columbia Sustainable International Equity Income ETF
12.31%39.85%6.02%5.57%
SPDG
SPDR Portfolio S&P Sector Neutral Dividend ETF
14.79%11.66%20.22%8.09%

Correlation

The correlation between ESGN and SPDG is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2023

0.57

The correlation between ESGN and SPDG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

ESGN vs. SPDG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ESGN
SPDG

Industrials

15.8%
9.0%

Financial Services

15.4%
13.3%

Energy

13.0%
4.1%

Utilities

9.3%
2.6%

Technology

7.0%
32.4%

Consumer Cyclical

6.6%
9.6%

Healthcare

3.9%
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

3.5%
5.4%

Basic Materials

1.9%
2.2%

Communication Services

1.2%
8.6%

Real Estate

0.2%
2.4%

Industrials

ESGN
15.8%
SPDG
9.0%

Financial Services

ESGN
15.4%
SPDG
13.3%

Energy

ESGN
13.0%
SPDG
4.1%

Utilities

ESGN
9.3%
SPDG
2.6%

Technology

ESGN
7.0%
SPDG
32.4%

Consumer Cyclical

ESGN
6.6%
SPDG
9.6%

Healthcare

ESGN
3.9%
SPDG
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

ESGN
3.5%
SPDG
5.4%

Basic Materials

ESGN
1.9%
SPDG
2.2%

Communication Services

ESGN
1.2%
SPDG
8.6%

Real Estate

ESGN
0.2%
SPDG
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESGN vs. SPDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ESGN
ESGN Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
ESGN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGN Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGN Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

SPDG
SPDG Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
SPDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPDG Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
SPDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPDG Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ESGN vs. SPDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Sustainable International Equity Income ETF (ESGN) and SPDR Portfolio S&P Sector Neutral Dividend ETF (SPDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ESGNSPDGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.36

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.05

3.03

+0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.84

9.88

-0.04

ESGN vs. SPDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESGN Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the SPDG Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESGN and SPDG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ESGN vs. SPDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESGN drawdown since its inception was -41.71%, which is greater than SPDG's maximum drawdown of -15.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGN and SPDG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESGNSPDGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.71%

-15.67%

-26.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.56%

-8.34%

-1.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-2.29%

+1.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.00%

-2.19%

-4.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

2.55%

+0.41%

Volatility

ESGN vs. SPDG - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Sustainable International Equity Income ETF (ESGN) has a higher volatility of 3.92% compared to SPDR Portfolio S&P Sector Neutral Dividend ETF (SPDG) at 3.53%. This indicates that ESGN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESGNSPDGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.92%

3.53%

+0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.45%

9.54%

+1.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.59%

12.45%

+1.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.34%

14.10%

+1.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.38%

14.10%

+2.28%

ESGN vs. SPDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESGN has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than SPDG's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

ESGN vs. SPDG - Dividend Comparison

ESGN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.30%, more than SPDG's 2.71% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ESGN
Columbia Sustainable International Equity Income ETF
9.30%9.76%3.11%3.27%3.57%3.43%2.64%3.34%7.25%4.63%2.52%
SPDG
SPDR Portfolio S&P Sector Neutral Dividend ETF
2.71%2.87%2.61%0.90%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ESGN and SPDG have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ESGN has higher volatility (3.92%) compared to SPDG (3.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESGN dropped -41.71% vs SPDG's -15.67%.

On 1-year performance, ESGN leads with 29.04% vs 25.12% for SPDG. On fees, SPDG is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, SPDG has been the lower-risk option at 3.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ESGN has performed better with a 29.04% return vs 25.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPDG is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for ESGN.

ESGN has the higher dividend yield at 9.30%, compared with 2.71% for SPDG.

ESGN tracks MSCI Beta ADV Sust Intl Equity Income 100, while SPDG tracks S&P Sector-Neutral High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: Ameriprise Financial and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ESGN and 0.05% for SPDG.

ESGN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESGN and SPDG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer