ESGN vs. IFLO

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

ESGN (Columbia Sustainable International Equity Income ETF) and IFLO (VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past year, ESGN returned 24.79% vs 33.15% for IFLO. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ESGN charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for IFLO.

Performance

ESGN vs. IFLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Sustainable International Equity Income ETF (ESGN) and VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESGN achieves a 8.50% return, which is significantly lower than IFLO's 18.73% return.

ESGN

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 1.41%
• 6M: 6.88%
• YTD: 8.50%
• 1Y: 24.79%
• 3Y*: 18.66%
• 5Y*: 12.78%
• 10Y*: 9.78%

IFLO

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: -0.54%
• 6M: 15.77%
• YTD: 18.73%
• 1Y: 33.15%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESGN vs. IFLO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ESGN Columbia Sustainable International Equity Income ETF	8.50%	16.39%
IFLO VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF	18.73%	13.12%

Correlation

The correlation between ESGN and IFLO is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025	0.83

The correlation between ESGN and IFLO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

ESGN vs. IFLO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ESGN	IFLO
Industrials	15.8%	18.1%
Financial Services	15.4%	1.1%
Energy	13.0%	12.1%
Utilities	9.3%	1.0%
Technology	7.0%	21.5%
Consumer Cyclical	6.6%	13.8%
Healthcare	3.9%	11.7%
Consumer Defensive	3.5%	2.8%
Basic Materials	1.9%	11.3%
Communication Services	1.2%	6.7%
Real Estate	0.2%	0.0%

Return for Risk

ESGN vs. IFLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESGN

ESGN Risk / Return Rank: 70
ESGN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
ESGN Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
ESGN Omega Ratio Rank: 73
ESGN Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
ESGN Martin Ratio Rank: 63

IFLO

IFLO Risk / Return Rank: 90
IFLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
IFLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
IFLO Omega Ratio Rank: 87
IFLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
IFLO Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESGN vs. IFLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Sustainable International Equity Income ETF (ESGN) and VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ESGN	IFLO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.83	2.29	-0.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.57	3.33	-0.76
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.41	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.61	5.17	-2.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.35	17.35	-8.99

ESGN vs. IFLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESGN Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the IFLO Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESGN and IFLO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ESGN vs. IFLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESGN drawdown since its inception was -41.71%, which is greater than IFLO's maximum drawdown of -6.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGN and IFLO.

Drawdown Indicators

	ESGN	IFLO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.71%	-6.44%	-35.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.56%	-6.44%	-3.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.38%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.51%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.71%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.44%	-1.89%	-0.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.02%	-1.30%	-5.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.98%	1.92%	+1.06%

Volatility

ESGN vs. IFLO - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Sustainable International Equity Income ETF (ESGN) has a higher volatility of 3.43% compared to VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO) at 3.18%. This indicates that ESGN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IFLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ESGN	IFLO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.43%	3.18%	+0.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.35%	12.01%	-0.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.65%	14.55%	-0.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.31%	14.51%	+0.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.35%	14.51%	+1.84%

ESGN vs. IFLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESGN has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than IFLO's 0.56% expense ratio.

Dividends

ESGN vs. IFLO - Dividend Comparison

ESGN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.62%, more than IFLO's 1.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
ESGN Columbia Sustainable International Equity Income ETF	9.62%	9.76%	3.11%	3.27%	3.57%	3.43%	2.64%	3.34%	7.25%	4.63%	2.52%
IFLO VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF	1.57%	0.73%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ESGN and IFLO in my portfolio?

ESGN and IFLO have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ESGN or IFLO?

ESGN has higher volatility (3.43%) compared to IFLO (3.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESGN dropped -41.71% vs IFLO's -6.44%.

Which ETF is better, ESGN or IFLO?

On 1-year performance, IFLO leads with 33.15% vs 24.79% for ESGN. On fees, ESGN is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, IFLO has been the lower-risk option at 3.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ESGN or IFLO?

Over the 1-year period, IFLO has performed better with a 33.15% return vs 24.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ESGN or IFLO?

ESGN is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for IFLO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ESGN or IFLO?

ESGN has the higher dividend yield at 9.62%, compared with 1.57% for IFLO.

What is the main difference between ESGN and IFLO?

They also come from different issuers: Ameriprise Financial and VictoryShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ESGN and 0.56% for IFLO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IFLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.