ESGG vs. SKOR
ESGG (FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund) and SKOR (FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - ESGG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the STOXX Global ESG Select KPIs Index, while SKOR is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the NorthernTrustUS Corporate Bond Quality Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ESGG returned 13.82%/yr vs 2.81%/yr for SKOR. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ESGG charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for SKOR.
Performance
ESGG vs. SKOR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESGG achieves a 13.15% return, which is significantly higher than SKOR's 0.48% return. Over the past 10 years, ESGG has outperformed SKOR with an annualized return of 13.82%, while SKOR has yielded a comparatively lower 2.81% annualized return.
ESGG
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- -0.39%
- 6M
- 11.83%
- YTD
- 13.15%
- 1Y
- 24.74%
- 3Y*
- 19.37%
- 5Y*
- 12.23%
- 10Y*
- 13.82%
SKOR
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -0.19%
- 6M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 0.48%
- 1Y
- 4.32%
- 3Y*
- 5.80%
- 5Y*
- 1.68%
- 10Y*
- 2.81%
ESGG vs. SKOR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGG FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund | 13.15% | 24.01% | 14.48% | 25.57% | -18.66% | 23.76% | 17.32% | 29.10% | -8.44% | 23.60% |
SKOR FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund | 0.48% | 7.99% | 4.42% | 7.64% | -9.88% | -1.40% | 8.84% | 10.69% | -1.25% | 4.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESGG and SKOR is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2016 | 0.20 |
The correlation between ESGG and SKOR shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (all time) to 0.39 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESGG vs. SKOR — Risk / Return Rank
ESGG
SKOR
ESGG vs. SKOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund (ESGG) and FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund (SKOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ESGG | SKOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.29 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.71 | 2.08 | +0.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.51 | 7.01 | +4.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ESGG vs. SKOR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESGG drawdown since its inception was -32.31%, which is greater than SKOR's maximum drawdown of -15.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGG and SKOR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESGG | SKOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.31% | -15.98% | -16.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.16% | -2.09% | -7.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.71% | -3.09% | -13.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.57% | -15.13% | -12.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.31% | -15.98% | -16.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.85% | -0.63% | -1.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.63% | -2.63% | -2.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.15% | 0.62% | +1.53% |
Volatility
ESGG vs. SKOR - Volatility Comparison
FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund (ESGG) has a higher volatility of 3.38% compared to FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund (SKOR) at 0.80%. This indicates that ESGG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SKOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESGG | SKOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.38% | 0.80% | +2.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.85% | 2.14% | +8.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.86% | 2.72% | +10.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.15% | 4.44% | +11.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.50% | 4.90% | +11.60% |
ESGG vs. SKOR - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESGG has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than SKOR's 0.22% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESGG vs. SKOR - Dividend Comparison
ESGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, less than SKOR's 4.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGG FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund | 1.30% | 1.39% | 1.84% | 1.73% | 1.83% | 1.34% | 1.36% | 1.94% | 2.12% | 1.71% | 0.87% | 0.00% |
SKOR FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund | 4.69% | 4.70% | 4.90% | 3.90% | 2.57% | 2.55% | 3.38% | 3.53% | 2.85% | 2.46% | 2.74% | 2.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESGG and SKOR have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ESGG has higher volatility (3.38%) compared to SKOR (0.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESGG dropped -32.31% vs SKOR's -15.98%.
On 10-year performance, ESGG leads with 13.82% vs 2.81% for SKOR. On fees, SKOR is cheaper at 0.22% per year. On volatility, SKOR has been the lower-risk option at 0.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ESGG has performed better with a 13.82% return vs 2.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SKOR is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for ESGG.
SKOR has the higher dividend yield at 4.69%, compared with 1.30% for ESGG.
ESGG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SKOR is Corporate Bonds. ESGG tracks STOXX Global ESG Select KPIs Index, while SKOR tracks NorthernTrustUS Corporate Bond Quality Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for ESGG and 0.22% for SKOR.
ESGG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ESGG and SKOR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer