PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESGG vs. QQQA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESGG vs. QQQA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund (ESGG) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESGG achieves a 14.72% return, which is significantly lower than QQQA's 65.37% return.


ESGG

1D
-0.48%
1M
8.86%
YTD
14.72%
6M
16.28%
1Y
31.41%
3Y*
21.51%
5Y*
12.78%
10Y*

QQQA

1D
2.20%
1M
23.31%
YTD
65.37%
6M
67.98%
1Y
88.43%
3Y*
34.58%
5Y*
14.74%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESGG vs. QQQA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ESGG
FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund
14.72%24.01%14.48%25.57%-18.66%11.96%
QQQA
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF
65.37%9.87%16.17%24.98%-29.08%8.43%

Correlation

The correlation between ESGG and QQQA is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2021

0.80

The correlation between ESGG and QQQA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

ESGG vs. QQQA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ESGG
QQQA

Technology

39.9%
65.2%

Financial Services

19.4%

-

Healthcare

11.8%
7.8%

Industrials

5.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.0%

-

Energy

4.3%
9.1%

Consumer Cyclical

4.0%
4.2%

Basic Materials

2.4%

-

Utilities

2.1%

-

Real Estate

1.2%

-

Communication Services

0.9%
13.7%

Technology

ESGG
39.9%
QQQA
65.2%

Financial Services

ESGG
19.4%
QQQA

-

Healthcare

ESGG
11.8%
QQQA
7.8%

Industrials

ESGG
5.2%
QQQA

-

Consumer Defensive

ESGG
5.0%
QQQA

-

Energy

ESGG
4.3%
QQQA
9.1%

Consumer Cyclical

ESGG
4.0%
QQQA
4.2%

Basic Materials

ESGG
2.4%
QQQA

-

Utilities

ESGG
2.1%
QQQA

-

Real Estate

ESGG
1.2%
QQQA

-

Communication Services

ESGG
0.9%
QQQA
13.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESGG vs. QQQA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESGG
ESGG Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
ESGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGG Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGG Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQA
QQQA Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
QQQA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQA Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQA Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESGG vs. QQQA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund (ESGG) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESGGQQQADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.54

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.44

6.11

-2.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.38

22.85

-7.47

ESGG vs. QQQA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESGG Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is comparable to the QQQA Sharpe Ratio of 3.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESGG and QQQA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESGGQQQADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.62

3.41

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.57

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.59

+0.27

Drawdowns

ESGG vs. QQQA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESGG drawdown since its inception was -32.31%, smaller than the maximum QQQA drawdown of -38.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGG and QQQA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESGGQQQADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.31%

-38.44%

+6.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.16%

-14.54%

+5.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.71%

-30.84%

+14.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.57%

-38.44%

+10.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

0.00%

-0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.66%

-15.68%

+11.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

3.88%

-1.83%

Volatility

ESGG vs. QQQA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund (ESGG) is 3.76%, while ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA) has a volatility of 10.17%. This indicates that ESGG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESGGQQQADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.76%

10.17%

-6.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.67%

22.18%

-12.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.05%

26.05%

-14.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.04%

25.83%

-9.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.51%

25.77%

-9.26%

ESGG vs. QQQA - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESGG has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQA's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

ESGG vs. QQQA - Dividend Comparison

ESGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, more than QQQA's 0.06% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ESGG
FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund
1.21%1.39%1.84%1.73%1.83%1.34%1.36%1.94%2.12%1.71%0.87%
QQQA
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF
0.06%0.10%0.09%0.34%0.28%0.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ESGG and QQQA have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQA has higher volatility (10.17%) compared to ESGG (3.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESGG dropped -32.31% vs QQQA's -38.44%.

On 5-year performance, QQQA leads with 14.74% vs 12.78% for ESGG. On fees, ESGG is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, ESGG has been the lower-risk option at 3.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QQQA has performed better with a 14.74% return vs 12.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ESGG is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for QQQA.

ESGG has the higher dividend yield at 1.21%, compared with 0.06% for QQQA.

ESGG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while QQQA is Nasdaq-100. ESGG tracks STOXX Global ESG Select KPIs Index, while QQQA tracks NASDAQ-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for ESGG and 0.58% for QQQA.

QQQA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.41 vs 2.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESGG and QQQA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer