ESGG vs. ITOT
ESGG (FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund) and ITOT (iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ESGG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the STOXX Global ESG Select KPIs Index, while ITOT is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P Total Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ESGG returned 12.78%/yr vs 12.69%/yr for ITOT. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ESGG charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for ITOT.
Performance
ESGG vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESGG achieves a 14.72% return, which is significantly higher than ITOT's 11.25% return.
ESGG
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 8.86%
- YTD
- 14.72%
- 6M
- 16.28%
- 1Y
- 31.41%
- 3Y*
- 21.51%
- 5Y*
- 12.78%
- 10Y*
- —
ITOT
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 5.01%
- YTD
- 11.25%
- 6M
- 11.12%
- 1Y
- 28.12%
- 3Y*
- 22.09%
- 5Y*
- 12.69%
- 10Y*
- 15.01%
ESGG vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGG FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund | 14.72% | 24.01% | 14.48% | 25.57% | -18.66% | 23.76% | 17.32% | 29.10% | -8.44% | 23.60% |
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 11.25% | 17.00% | 23.80% | 26.12% | -19.47% | 25.68% | 20.71% | 30.67% | -5.33% | 21.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESGG and ITOT is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2016 | 0.87 |
The correlation between ESGG and ITOT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
ESGG vs. ITOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ESGG
ITOT
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Communication Services
Technology
ESGG
ITOT
Financial Services
ESGG
ITOT
Healthcare
ESGG
ITOT
Industrials
ESGG
ITOT
Consumer Defensive
ESGG
ITOT
Energy
ESGG
ITOT
Consumer Cyclical
ESGG
ITOT
Basic Materials
ESGG
ITOT
Utilities
ESGG
ITOT
Real Estate
ESGG
ITOT
Communication Services
ESGG
ITOT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESGG vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank
ESGG
ITOT
ESGG vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund (ESGG) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESGG | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.42 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.44 | 3.17 | +0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.38 | 14.57 | +0.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESGG | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.62 | 2.32 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.74 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.57 | +0.29 |
Drawdowns
ESGG vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESGG drawdown since its inception was -32.31%, smaller than the maximum ITOT drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGG and ITOT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESGG | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.31% | -55.20% | +22.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.16% | -8.90% | -0.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.71% | -19.44% | +2.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.57% | -25.36% | -2.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.48% | -0.73% | +0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.66% | -6.97% | +2.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.05% | 1.94% | +0.11% |
Volatility
ESGG vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison
FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund (ESGG) has a higher volatility of 3.76% compared to iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) at 2.99%. This indicates that ESGG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ITOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESGG | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.76% | 2.99% | +0.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.67% | 9.13% | +0.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.05% | 12.20% | -0.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.04% | 17.36% | -1.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.51% | 18.26% | -1.75% |
ESGG vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESGG has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESGG vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison
ESGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, more than ITOT's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGG FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund | 1.21% | 1.39% | 1.84% | 1.73% | 1.83% | 1.34% | 1.36% | 1.94% | 2.12% | 1.71% | 0.87% | 0.00% |
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 0.98% | 1.11% | 1.23% | 1.47% | 1.66% | 1.18% | 1.41% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 1.69% | 1.83% | 2.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, ESGG and ITOT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ESGG has higher volatility (3.76%) compared to ITOT (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESGG dropped -32.31% vs ITOT's -55.20%.
On 5-year performance, ESGG leads with 12.78% vs 12.69% for ITOT. On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ITOT has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ESGG has performed better with a 12.78% return vs 12.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for ESGG.
ESGG has the higher dividend yield at 1.21%, compared with 0.98% for ITOT.
ESGG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while ITOT is Large Cap Blend Equities. ESGG tracks STOXX Global ESG Select KPIs Index, while ITOT tracks S&P Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for ESGG and 0.03% for ITOT.
ESGG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ESGG and ITOT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer