PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESGG vs. ITOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESGG vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund (ESGG) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESGG achieves a 14.72% return, which is significantly higher than ITOT's 11.25% return.


ESGG

1D
-0.48%
1M
8.86%
YTD
14.72%
6M
16.28%
1Y
31.41%
3Y*
21.51%
5Y*
12.78%
10Y*

ITOT

1D
-0.73%
1M
5.01%
YTD
11.25%
6M
11.12%
1Y
28.12%
3Y*
22.09%
5Y*
12.69%
10Y*
15.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESGG vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ESGG
FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund
14.72%24.01%14.48%25.57%-18.66%23.76%17.32%29.10%-8.44%23.60%
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
11.25%17.00%23.80%26.12%-19.47%25.68%20.71%30.67%-5.33%21.37%

Correlation

The correlation between ESGG and ITOT is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2016

0.87

The correlation between ESGG and ITOT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

ESGG vs. ITOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ESGG
ITOT

Technology

39.9%
33.8%

Financial Services

19.4%
12.1%

Healthcare

11.8%
9.0%

Industrials

5.2%
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
4.7%

Energy

4.3%
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

4.0%
10.1%

Basic Materials

2.4%
2.1%

Utilities

2.1%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.2%
2.4%

Communication Services

0.9%
10.3%

Technology

ESGG
39.9%
ITOT
33.8%

Financial Services

ESGG
19.4%
ITOT
12.1%

Healthcare

ESGG
11.8%
ITOT
9.0%

Industrials

ESGG
5.2%
ITOT
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

ESGG
5.0%
ITOT
4.7%

Energy

ESGG
4.3%
ITOT
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

ESGG
4.0%
ITOT
10.1%

Basic Materials

ESGG
2.4%
ITOT
2.1%

Utilities

ESGG
2.1%
ITOT
2.3%

Real Estate

ESGG
1.2%
ITOT
2.4%

Communication Services

ESGG
0.9%
ITOT
10.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESGG vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESGG
ESGG Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
ESGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGG Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGG Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

ITOT
ITOT Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
ITOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITOT Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ITOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITOT Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESGG vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund (ESGG) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESGGITOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.42

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.44

3.17

+0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.38

14.57

+0.81

ESGG vs. ITOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESGG Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is comparable to the ITOT Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESGG and ITOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESGGITOTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.62

2.32

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.74

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.57

+0.29

Drawdowns

ESGG vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESGG drawdown since its inception was -32.31%, smaller than the maximum ITOT drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGG and ITOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESGGITOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.31%

-55.20%

+22.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.16%

-8.90%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.71%

-19.44%

+2.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.57%

-25.36%

-2.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

-0.73%

+0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.66%

-6.97%

+2.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

1.94%

+0.11%

Volatility

ESGG vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund (ESGG) has a higher volatility of 3.76% compared to iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) at 2.99%. This indicates that ESGG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ITOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESGGITOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.76%

2.99%

+0.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.67%

9.13%

+0.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.05%

12.20%

-0.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.04%

17.36%

-1.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.51%

18.26%

-1.75%

ESGG vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESGG has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

ESGG vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison

ESGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, more than ITOT's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ESGG
FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund
1.21%1.39%1.84%1.73%1.83%1.34%1.36%1.94%2.12%1.71%0.87%0.00%
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
0.98%1.11%1.23%1.47%1.66%1.18%1.41%1.88%2.14%1.69%1.83%2.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, ESGG and ITOT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ESGG has higher volatility (3.76%) compared to ITOT (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESGG dropped -32.31% vs ITOT's -55.20%.

On 5-year performance, ESGG leads with 12.78% vs 12.69% for ITOT. On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ITOT has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ESGG has performed better with a 12.78% return vs 12.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for ESGG.

ESGG has the higher dividend yield at 1.21%, compared with 0.98% for ITOT.

ESGG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while ITOT is Large Cap Blend Equities. ESGG tracks STOXX Global ESG Select KPIs Index, while ITOT tracks S&P Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for ESGG and 0.03% for ITOT.

ESGG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESGG and ITOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer