PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESGG vs. GUNR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESGG vs. GUNR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund (ESGG) and FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund (GUNR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ESGG having a 14.95% return and GUNR slightly lower at 14.39%. Over the past 10 years, ESGG has outperformed GUNR with an annualized return of 13.94%, while GUNR has yielded a comparatively lower 10.05% annualized return.


ESGG

1D
0.53%
1M
1.39%
6M
11.36%
YTD
14.95%
1Y
27.50%
3Y*
20.42%
5Y*
12.16%
10Y*
13.94%
ALL TIME*
13.88%

GUNR

1D
-0.84%
1M
4.20%
6M
3.67%
YTD
14.39%
1Y
32.63%
3Y*
11.02%
5Y*
10.41%
10Y*
10.05%
ALL TIME*
6.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$88.70K$102.70K$84.24K
$77.78M$41.91M$28.99M

ESGG vs. GUNR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ESGG
FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund
14.95%24.01%14.48%25.57%-18.66%23.76%17.32%29.10%-8.44%23.60%
GUNR
FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund
14.39%30.03%-8.37%-2.40%14.83%26.06%0.46%18.41%-9.42%18.74%

Correlation

The correlation between ESGG and GUNR is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2016

0.60

The correlation between ESGG and GUNR shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.60 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ESGG vs. GUNR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ESGG
GUNR

Technology

40.0%
0.5%

Financial Services

19.5%
0.0%

Healthcare

14.1%

-

Industrials

6.8%
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

5.4%
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

4.4%
0.4%

Energy

4.2%
29.2%

Basic Materials

2.0%
52.3%

Utilities

1.4%
5.4%

Communication Services

1.3%
1.7%

Real Estate

1.1%
1.2%

Technology

ESGG
40.0%
GUNR
0.5%

Financial Services

ESGG
19.5%
GUNR
0.0%

Healthcare

ESGG
14.1%
GUNR

-

Industrials

ESGG
6.8%
GUNR
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

ESGG
5.4%
GUNR
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

ESGG
4.4%
GUNR
0.4%

Energy

ESGG
4.2%
GUNR
29.2%

Basic Materials

ESGG
2.0%
GUNR
52.3%

Utilities

ESGG
1.4%
GUNR
5.4%

Communication Services

ESGG
1.3%
GUNR
1.7%

Real Estate

ESGG
1.1%
GUNR
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESGG vs. GUNR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ESGG
ESGG Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
ESGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGG Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGG Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

GUNR
GUNR Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
GUNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GUNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
GUNR Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
GUNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
GUNR Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ESGG vs. GUNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund (ESGG) and FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund (GUNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ESGGGUNRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.36

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.01

2.80

+0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.72

8.76

+3.97

ESGG vs. GUNR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESGG Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the GUNR Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESGG and GUNR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ESGG vs. GUNR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESGG drawdown since its inception was -32.31%, smaller than the maximum GUNR drawdown of -45.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGG and GUNR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESGGGUNRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.31%

-45.64%

+13.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.16%

-11.70%

+2.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.71%

-19.59%

+2.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.57%

-24.06%

-3.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.31%

-43.04%

+10.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

-6.49%

+6.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.61%

-10.37%

+5.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.17%

3.74%

-1.57%

Volatility

ESGG vs. GUNR - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund (ESGG) and FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund (GUNR) have volatilities of 4.19% and 4.06%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESGGGUNRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.19%

4.06%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.16%

12.60%

-1.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.24%

15.98%

-2.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.19%

18.95%

-2.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.55%

20.33%

-3.78%

ESGG vs. GUNR - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESGG has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than GUNR's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

ESGG vs. GUNR - Dividend Comparison

ESGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, less than GUNR's 2.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ESGG
FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund
1.28%1.39%1.84%1.73%1.83%1.34%1.36%1.94%2.12%1.71%0.87%0.00%
GUNR
FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund
2.34%2.81%3.39%3.55%4.12%3.61%2.79%3.25%3.27%2.00%1.73%4.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


ESGG and GUNR have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ESGG has higher volatility (4.19%) compared to GUNR (4.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESGG dropped -32.31% vs GUNR's -45.64%.

On 10-year performance, ESGG leads with 13.94% vs 10.05% for GUNR. On fees, ESGG is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, GUNR has been the lower-risk option at 4.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ESGG has performed better with a 13.94% return vs 10.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ESGG is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for GUNR.

GUNR has the higher dividend yield at 2.34%, compared with 1.28% for ESGG.

ESGG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while GUNR is Natural Resources. ESGG tracks STOXX Global ESG Select KPIs Index, while GUNR tracks Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for ESGG and 0.46% for GUNR.

ESGG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESGG and GUNR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer