ESGG vs. GARY
ESGG (FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund) and GARY (Mango Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. ESGG is passively managed, while GARY is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ESGG charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for GARY.
Performance
ESGG vs. GARY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESGG achieves a 13.53% return, which is significantly lower than GARY's 30.03% return.
ESGG
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- 6M
- 11.57%
- YTD
- 13.53%
- 1Y
- 24.72%
- 3Y*
- 19.55%
- 5Y*
- 11.93%
- 10Y*
- 13.86%
GARY
- 1D
- -1.55%
- 1M
- -0.00%
- 6M
- 22.99%
- YTD
- 30.03%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ESGG vs. GARY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ESGG FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund | 13.53% | 0.79% |
GARY Mango Growth ETF | 30.03% | 0.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESGG and GARY is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2025 | 0.87 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESGG vs. GARY — Risk / Return Rank
ESGG
GARY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ESGG vs. GARY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund (ESGG) and Mango Growth ETF (GARY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ESGG | GARY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.71 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.53 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ESGG vs. GARY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESGG drawdown since its inception was -32.31%, which is greater than GARY's maximum drawdown of -10.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGG and GARY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESGG | GARY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.31% | -10.28% | -22.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.71% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.57% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.52% | -5.23% | +3.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.63% | -1.87% | -2.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.15% | — | — |
Volatility
ESGG vs. GARY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESGG | GARY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.24% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.85% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.88% | 21.84% | -8.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.16% | 21.84% | -5.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.51% | 21.84% | -5.33% |
ESGG vs. GARY - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESGG has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than GARY's 0.77% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESGG vs. GARY - Dividend Comparison
ESGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, more than GARY's 0.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGG FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund | 1.30% | 1.39% | 1.84% | 1.73% | 1.83% | 1.34% | 1.36% | 1.94% | 2.12% | 1.71% | 0.87% |
GARY Mango Growth ETF | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESGG and GARY have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ESGG is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ESGG is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for GARY.
ESGG has the higher dividend yield at 1.30%, compared with 0.04% for GARY.
They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Mango. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for ESGG and 0.77% for GARY.
Find the right allocation for ESGG and GARY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer