ESGG vs. DARP

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

ESGG (FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund) and DARP (Grizzle Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. ESGG is passively managed, while DARP is actively managed. Over the past year, ESGG returned 27.50% vs 53.03% for DARP. Their 0.76 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ESGG charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for DARP.

Performance

ESGG vs. DARP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund (ESGG) and Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESGG achieves a 14.95% return, which is significantly lower than DARP's 24.09% return.

ESGG

• 1D: 0.53%
• 1M: 1.39%
• 6M: 11.36%
• YTD: 14.95%
• 1Y: 27.50%
• 3Y*: 20.42%
• 5Y*: 12.16%
• 10Y*: 13.94%
• ALL TIME*: 13.88%

DARP

• 1D: 2.48%
• 1M: -1.50%
• 6M: 11.54%
• YTD: 24.09%
• 1Y: 53.03%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 32.92%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DARP Grizzle Growth ETF	$367.14K	$288.77K	$436.18K
ESGG FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund	$88.70K	$102.70K	$84.24K

ESGG vs. DARP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
ESGG FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund	14.95%	24.01%	14.48%	9.17%
DARP Grizzle Growth ETF	24.09%	40.19%	24.63%	6.25%

Correlation

The correlation between ESGG and DARP is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2023	0.76

The correlation between ESGG and DARP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

ESGG vs. DARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ESGG	DARP
Technology	40.0%	48.3%
Financial Services	19.5%	-
Healthcare	14.1%	1.4%
Industrials	6.8%	8.2%
Consumer Defensive	5.4%	-
Consumer Cyclical	4.4%	8.3%
Energy	4.2%	9.2%
Basic Materials	2.0%	4.2%
Utilities	1.4%	5.2%
Communication Services	1.3%	13.5%
Real Estate	1.1%	-

Return for Risk

ESGG vs. DARP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ESGG

ESGG Risk / Return Rank: 83
ESGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
ESGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
ESGG Omega Ratio Rank: 83
ESGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
ESGG Martin Ratio Rank: 85

DARP

DARP Risk / Return Rank: 80
DARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
DARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
DARP Omega Ratio Rank: 72
DARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
DARP Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ESGG vs. DARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund (ESGG) and Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ESGG	DARP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.09	1.99	+0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.96	2.47	+0.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.31	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.01	3.38	-0.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.72	12.79	-0.07

ESGG vs. DARP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESGG Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the DARP Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESGG and DARP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ESGG vs. DARP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESGG drawdown since its inception was -32.31%, which is greater than DARP's maximum drawdown of -30.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGG and DARP.

Drawdown Indicators

	ESGG	DARP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.31%	-30.27%	-2.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.16%	-15.76%	+6.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.71%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.57%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.31%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.29%	-7.17%	+6.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.61%	-4.72%	+0.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.17%	4.16%	-1.99%

Volatility

ESGG vs. DARP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund (ESGG) is 4.19%, while Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP) has a volatility of 9.89%. This indicates that ESGG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ESGG	DARP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.19%	9.89%	-5.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.16%	21.41%	-10.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.24%	26.90%	-13.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.19%	26.84%	-10.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.55%	26.84%	-10.29%

ESGG vs. DARP - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESGG has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than DARP's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

ESGG vs. DARP - Dividend Comparison

ESGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, more than DARP's 0.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
DARP Grizzle Growth ETF	0.35%	0.43%	1.93%	0.32%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ESGG FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund	1.28%	1.39%	1.84%	1.73%	1.83%	1.34%	1.36%	1.94%	2.12%	1.71%	0.87%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ESGG and DARP in my portfolio?

ESGG and DARP have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ESGG or DARP?

DARP has higher volatility (9.89%) compared to ESGG (4.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESGG dropped -32.31% vs DARP's -30.27%.

Which ETF is better, ESGG or DARP?

On 1-year performance, DARP leads with 53.03% vs 27.50% for ESGG. On fees, ESGG is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, ESGG has been the lower-risk option at 4.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ESGG or DARP?

Over the 1-year period, DARP has performed better with a 53.03% return vs 27.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ESGG or DARP?

ESGG is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for DARP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ESGG or DARP?

ESGG has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 0.35% for DARP.

What is the main difference between ESGG and DARP?

They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Grizzle. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for ESGG and 0.75% for DARP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ESGG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.