ESGD vs. UGA
ESGD (iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF) and UGA (United States Gasoline Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - ESGD is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Extended ESG Focus Index, while UGA is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ESGD returned 8.05%/yr vs 22.22%/yr for UGA. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ESGD charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UGA.
Performance
ESGD vs. UGA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESGD achieves a 8.13% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 59.54% return.
ESGD
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- YTD
- 8.13%
- 6M
- 7.64%
- 1Y
- 19.32%
- 3Y*
- 16.04%
- 5Y*
- 8.05%
- 10Y*
- —
UGA
- 1D
- -2.77%
- 1M
- -14.54%
- YTD
- 59.54%
- 6M
- 55.91%
- 1Y
- 62.68%
- 3Y*
- 17.85%
- 5Y*
- 22.22%
- 10Y*
- 13.99%
ESGD vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGD iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF | 8.13% | 29.63% | 3.95% | 18.53% | -15.17% | 11.79% | 8.20% | 23.12% | -13.33% | 25.10% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 59.54% | -2.00% | 3.77% | 1.27% | 46.34% | 68.49% | -24.88% | 41.25% | -28.07% | 1.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESGD and UGA is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2016 | 0.17 |
The correlation between ESGD and UGA shifts across timeframes, from -0.30 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESGD vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank
ESGD
UGA
ESGD vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF (ESGD) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ESGD | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.31 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.66 | 3.10 | -1.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.19 | 9.66 | -3.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ESGD vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESGD drawdown since its inception was -33.70%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGD and UGA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESGD | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.70% | -86.59% | +52.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.68% | -20.32% | +8.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.86% | -26.68% | +12.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.03% | -38.11% | +8.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.26% | -20.32% | +18.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.16% | -36.69% | +30.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.13% | 6.51% | -3.38% |
Volatility
ESGD vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF (ESGD) is 5.48%, while United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) has a volatility of 9.45%. This indicates that ESGD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESGD | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.48% | 9.45% | -3.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.44% | 30.74% | -17.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.85% | 34.84% | -18.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.71% | 34.47% | -17.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.00% | 37.22% | -20.22% |
ESGD vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESGD has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESGD vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison
ESGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGD iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF | 3.38% | 3.60% | 3.23% | 3.02% | 2.59% | 2.75% | 1.63% | 2.57% | 2.69% | 2.65% | 0.09% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESGD and UGA have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UGA has higher volatility (9.45%) compared to ESGD (5.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESGD dropped -33.70% vs UGA's -86.59%.
On 5-year performance, UGA leads with 22.22% vs 8.05% for ESGD. On fees, ESGD is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ESGD has been the lower-risk option at 5.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, UGA has performed better with a 22.22% return vs 8.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ESGD is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UGA.
ESGD has the higher dividend yield at 3.38%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.
ESGD is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while UGA is Oil & Gas. ESGD tracks MSCI EAFE Extended ESG Focus Index, while UGA tracks Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ESGD and 0.75% for UGA.
UGA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ESGD and UGA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer