ESGB.L vs. LQQ.PA
ESGB.L (VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF A USD) and LQQ.PA (Lyxor UCITS NASDAQ-100 Daily Leverage) are both exchange-traded funds - ESGB.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while LQQ.PA is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq 100® Leverage (2x) index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ESGB.L returned 7.72%/yr vs 27.06%/yr for LQQ.PA. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ESGB.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for LQQ.PA.
Performance
ESGB.L vs. LQQ.PA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ESGB.L is traded in GBP, while LQQ.PA is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the LQQ.PA values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESGB.L achieves a -13.64% return, which is significantly lower than LQQ.PA's 38.86% return.
ESGB.L
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -0.16%
- YTD
- -13.64%
- 6M
- -17.38%
- 1Y
- -11.52%
- 3Y*
- 16.72%
- 5Y*
- 7.72%
- 10Y*
- —
LQQ.PA
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- 14.83%
- YTD
- 38.86%
- 6M
- 34.27%
- 1Y
- 81.55%
- 3Y*
- 45.01%
- 5Y*
- 27.06%
- 10Y*
- 36.95%
ESGB.L vs. LQQ.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGB.L VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF A USD | -13.64% | 18.62% | 51.06% | 25.92% | -27.12% | -1.36% | 80.84% | 10.77% |
LQQ.PA Lyxor UCITS NASDAQ-100 Daily Leverage | 38.86% | 20.27% | 49.88% | 108.09% | -57.09% | 61.06% | 84.01% | 21.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESGB.L and LQQ.PA is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2019 | 0.67 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ESGB.L and LQQ.PA has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESGB.L vs. LQQ.PA — Risk / Return Rank
ESGB.L
LQQ.PA
ESGB.L vs. LQQ.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF A USD (ESGB.L) and Lyxor UCITS NASDAQ-100 Daily Leverage (LQQ.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESGB.L | LQQ.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.43 | -0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.43 | 3.63 | -4.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.76 | 11.06 | -11.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESGB.L | LQQ.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.68 | 2.74 | -3.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 0.68 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.95 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 0.72 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
ESGB.L vs. LQQ.PA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESGB.L drawdown since its inception was -39.40%, smaller than the maximum LQQ.PA drawdown of -69.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGB.L and LQQ.PA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESGB.L | LQQ.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.40% | -69.49% | +30.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.63% | -22.74% | -3.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.63% | -42.84% | +16.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.60% | -59.16% | +21.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.21% | -1.31% | -23.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.09% | -13.85% | +0.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.99% | 7.51% | +7.48% |
Volatility
ESGB.L vs. LQQ.PA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF A USD (ESGB.L) is 3.96%, while Lyxor UCITS NASDAQ-100 Daily Leverage (LQQ.PA) has a volatility of 9.27%. This indicates that ESGB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LQQ.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESGB.L | LQQ.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.96% | 9.27% | -5.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.09% | 21.97% | -8.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.79% | 30.10% | -13.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.02% | 39.16% | -17.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.81% | 38.33% | -15.52% |
ESGB.L vs. LQQ.PA - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESGB.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than LQQ.PA's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESGB.L vs. LQQ.PA - Dividend Comparison
Neither ESGB.L nor LQQ.PA has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ESGB.L and LQQ.PA have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ESGB.L is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ESGB.L is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for LQQ.PA.
ESGB.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while LQQ.PA is Nasdaq-100. ESGB.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while LQQ.PA tracks Nasdaq 100® Leverage (2x) index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ESGB.L and 0.60% for LQQ.PA.
Find the right allocation for ESGB.L and LQQ.PA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer