ESG vs. SPTM
ESG (FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund) and SPTM (SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - ESG tracks the STOXX USA ESG Select KPIs Index while SPTM tracks the S&P Composite 1500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ESG returned 14.84%/yr vs 14.86%/yr for SPTM. Their correlation of 0.88 means they have usually moved in the same direction. ESG charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SPTM.
Performance
ESG vs. SPTM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESG achieves a 11.91% return, which is significantly higher than SPTM's 10.61% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ESG having a 14.84% annualized return and SPTM not far ahead at 14.86%.
ESG
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 0.58%
- 6M
- 9.98%
- YTD
- 11.91%
- 1Y
- 22.28%
- 3Y*
- 17.88%
- 5Y*
- 11.70%
- 10Y*
- 14.84%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.86%
SPTM
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- 6M
- 8.81%
- YTD
- 10.61%
- 1Y
- 21.87%
- 3Y*
- 18.90%
- 5Y*
- 12.48%
- 10Y*
- 14.86%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.78%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $141.70K | $104.98K | $155.55K | |
| $40.04M | $39.69M | $45.49M |
ESG vs. SPTM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESG FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund | 11.91% | 16.04% | 20.22% | 27.86% | -19.89% | 28.48% | 20.75% | 31.74% | -5.17% | 22.78% |
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF | 10.61% | 16.93% | 23.87% | 25.55% | -17.75% | 28.58% | 17.94% | 31.34% | -5.30% | 21.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESG and SPTM is 0.95, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2016 | 0.88 |
The correlation between ESG and SPTM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
ESG vs. SPTM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ESG
SPTM
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Communication Services
Utilities
Technology
ESG
SPTM
Financial Services
ESG
SPTM
Healthcare
ESG
SPTM
Consumer Defensive
ESG
SPTM
Consumer Cyclical
ESG
SPTM
Industrials
ESG
SPTM
Energy
ESG
SPTM
Basic Materials
ESG
SPTM
Real Estate
ESG
SPTM
Communication Services
ESG
SPTM
Utilities
ESG
SPTM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESG vs. SPTM — Risk / Return Rank
ESG
SPTM
ESG vs. SPTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund (ESG) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ESG | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.28 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.36 | 2.31 | +0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.79 | 10.07 | -0.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ESG vs. SPTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESG drawdown since its inception was -32.53%, smaller than the maximum SPTM drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESG and SPTM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESG | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.53% | -54.80% | +22.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.68% | -8.68% | 0.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.32% | -18.87% | +0.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.04% | -24.14% | -1.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.53% | -34.66% | +2.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.71% | -1.11% | +0.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.01% | -9.00% | +3.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.09% | 1.99% | +0.10% |
Volatility
ESG vs. SPTM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund (ESG) is 3.30%, while SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) has a volatility of 3.50%. This indicates that ESG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESG | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.30% | 3.50% | -0.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.35% | 10.02% | -0.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.82% | 12.81% | -0.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.79% | 16.97% | -0.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.33% | 18.03% | +0.30% |
ESG vs. SPTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESG has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTM's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESG vs. SPTM - Dividend Comparison
ESG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than SPTM's 1.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESG FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund | 0.87% | 0.96% | 1.18% | 1.10% | 1.38% | 1.03% | 1.33% | 1.51% | 1.72% | 1.52% | 0.92% | 0.00% |
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF | 1.06% | 1.13% | 1.28% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.56% | 1.72% | 1.90% | 1.66% | 1.91% | 1.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, ESG and SPTM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SPTM has higher volatility (3.50%) compared to ESG (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESG dropped -32.53% vs SPTM's -54.80%.
On 10-year performance, SPTM leads with 14.86% vs 14.84% for ESG. On fees, SPTM is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ESG has been the lower-risk option at 3.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPTM has performed better with a 14.86% return vs 14.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPTM is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for ESG.
SPTM has the higher dividend yield at 1.06%, compared with 0.87% for ESG.
ESG tracks STOXX USA ESG Select KPIs Index, while SPTM tracks S&P Composite 1500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for ESG and 0.03% for SPTM.
ESG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ESG and SPTM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer