PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESG vs. IUSG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESG vs. IUSG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund (ESG) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ESG having a 11.73% return and IUSG slightly lower at 11.21%. Over the past 10 years, ESG has underperformed IUSG with an annualized return of 14.93%, while IUSG has yielded a comparatively higher 17.26% annualized return.


ESG

1D
-0.52%
1M
1.34%
6M
9.94%
YTD
11.73%
1Y
20.77%
3Y*
18.53%
5Y*
11.82%
10Y*
14.93%

IUSG

1D
-1.62%
1M
0.93%
6M
9.36%
YTD
11.21%
1Y
23.87%
3Y*
24.42%
5Y*
13.28%
10Y*
17.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESG vs. IUSG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ESG
FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund
11.73%16.04%20.22%27.86%-19.89%28.48%20.75%31.74%-5.17%22.78%
IUSG
iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF
11.21%21.23%34.70%29.28%-28.81%31.26%32.65%30.62%-0.79%27.02%

Correlation

The correlation between ESG and IUSG is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2016

0.84

The correlation between ESG and IUSG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

ESG vs. IUSG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ESG
IUSG

Technology

37.4%
49.9%

Financial Services

17.1%
9.0%

Healthcare

11.3%
6.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

9.3%
1.2%

Industrials

4.9%
6.7%

Energy

3.2%
0.3%

Basic Materials

2.9%
0.5%

Real Estate

2.8%
0.9%

Communication Services

1.0%
15.1%

Utilities

0.1%
1.2%

Technology

ESG
37.4%
IUSG
49.9%

Financial Services

ESG
17.1%
IUSG
9.0%

Healthcare

ESG
11.3%
IUSG
6.8%

Consumer Cyclical

ESG
10.1%
IUSG
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

ESG
9.3%
IUSG
1.2%

Industrials

ESG
4.9%
IUSG
6.7%

Energy

ESG
3.2%
IUSG
0.3%

Basic Materials

ESG
2.9%
IUSG
0.5%

Real Estate

ESG
2.8%
IUSG
0.9%

Communication Services

ESG
1.0%
IUSG
15.1%

Utilities

ESG
0.1%
IUSG
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESG vs. IUSG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESG
ESG Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
ESG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESG Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
ESG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESG Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

IUSG
IUSG Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
IUSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUSG Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
IUSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUSG Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESG vs. IUSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund (ESG) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ESGIUSGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.25

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

1.83

+0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.02

7.22

+2.80

ESG vs. IUSG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESG Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the IUSG Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESG and IUSG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ESG vs. IUSG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESG drawdown since its inception was -32.53%, smaller than the maximum IUSG drawdown of -63.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESG and IUSG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESGIUSGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.53%

-63.41%

+30.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.68%

-13.07%

+4.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.32%

-22.28%

+3.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.04%

-32.21%

+6.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.53%

-32.35%

-0.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.86%

-3.48%

+2.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.03%

-21.37%

+16.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.08%

3.31%

-1.23%

Volatility

ESG vs. IUSG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund (ESG) is 3.25%, while iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) has a volatility of 6.32%. This indicates that ESG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESGIUSGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.25%

6.32%

-3.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.20%

13.99%

-4.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.53%

17.12%

-5.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.80%

21.11%

-4.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.31%

20.48%

-2.17%

ESG vs. IUSG - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESG has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than IUSG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

ESG vs. IUSG - Dividend Comparison

ESG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, more than IUSG's 0.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ESG
FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund
0.87%0.96%1.18%1.10%1.38%1.03%1.33%1.51%1.72%1.52%0.92%0.00%
IUSG
iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF
0.49%0.53%0.59%1.12%1.07%0.59%0.93%1.64%1.32%1.28%1.48%1.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


ESG and IUSG have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IUSG has higher volatility (6.32%) compared to ESG (3.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESG dropped -32.53% vs IUSG's -63.41%.

On 10-year performance, IUSG leads with 17.26% vs 14.93% for ESG. On fees, IUSG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, ESG has been the lower-risk option at 3.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IUSG has performed better with a 17.26% return vs 14.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IUSG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for ESG.

ESG has the higher dividend yield at 0.87%, compared with 0.49% for IUSG.

ESG tracks STOXX USA ESG Select KPIs Index, while IUSG tracks S&P 900 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for ESG and 0.04% for IUSG.

ESG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESG and IUSG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer