ESG vs. FTIF
ESG (FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund) and FTIF (First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - ESG tracks the STOXX USA ESG Select KPIs Index while FTIF tracks the Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ESG returned 17.88%/yr vs 10.74%/yr for FTIF. Their 0.59 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ESG charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FTIF.
Performance
ESG vs. FTIF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESG achieves a 11.91% return, which is significantly lower than FTIF's 24.04% return.
ESG
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 0.58%
- 6M
- 9.98%
- YTD
- 11.91%
- 1Y
- 22.28%
- 3Y*
- 17.88%
- 5Y*
- 11.70%
- 10Y*
- 14.84%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.86%
FTIF
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 4.50%
- 6M
- 14.08%
- YTD
- 24.04%
- 1Y
- 33.91%
- 3Y*
- 10.74%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.94%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $141.70K | $104.98K | $155.55K | |
| $126.29K | $72.10K | $61.82K |
ESG vs. FTIF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ESG FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund | 11.91% | 16.04% | 20.22% | 26.02% |
FTIF First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF | 24.04% | 7.79% | 0.50% | 12.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESG and FTIF is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2023 | 0.59 |
The correlation between ESG and FTIF shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.59 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ESG vs. FTIF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ESG
FTIF
Technology
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Technology
ESG
FTIF
Financial Services
ESG
FTIF
-
Healthcare
ESG
FTIF
-
Consumer Defensive
ESG
FTIF
-
Consumer Cyclical
ESG
FTIF
Industrials
ESG
FTIF
Energy
ESG
FTIF
Basic Materials
ESG
FTIF
Real Estate
ESG
FTIF
Communication Services
ESG
FTIF
-
Utilities
ESG
FTIF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESG vs. FTIF — Risk / Return Rank
ESG
FTIF
ESG vs. FTIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund (ESG) and First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ESG | FTIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.36 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.36 | 4.88 | -2.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.79 | 14.19 | -4.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ESG vs. FTIF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESG drawdown since its inception was -32.53%, which is greater than FTIF's maximum drawdown of -27.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESG and FTIF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESG | FTIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.53% | -27.83% | -4.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.68% | -6.34% | -2.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.32% | -27.83% | +9.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.04% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.53% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.71% | -1.90% | +1.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.01% | -5.90% | +0.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.09% | 2.20% | -0.11% |
Volatility
ESG vs. FTIF - Volatility Comparison
FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund (ESG) has a higher volatility of 3.30% compared to First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF) at 2.73%. This indicates that ESG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTIF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESG | FTIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.30% | 2.73% | +0.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.35% | 10.51% | -1.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.82% | 15.04% | -3.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.79% | 18.73% | -1.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.33% | 18.73% | -0.40% |
ESG vs. FTIF - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESG has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than FTIF's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESG vs. FTIF - Dividend Comparison
ESG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than FTIF's 1.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESG FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund | 0.87% | 0.96% | 1.18% | 1.10% | 1.38% | 1.03% | 1.33% | 1.51% | 1.72% | 1.52% | 0.92% |
FTIF First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF | 1.08% | 1.45% | 2.88% | 1.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESG and FTIF have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ESG has higher volatility (3.30%) compared to FTIF (2.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESG dropped -32.53% vs FTIF's -27.83%.
On 3-year performance, ESG leads with 17.88% vs 10.74% for FTIF. On fees, ESG is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, FTIF has been the lower-risk option at 2.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, ESG has performed better with a 17.88% return vs 10.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ESG is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTIF.
FTIF has the higher dividend yield at 1.08%, compared with 0.87% for ESG.
ESG tracks STOXX USA ESG Select KPIs Index, while FTIF tracks Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for ESG and 0.60% for FTIF.
FTIF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ESG and FTIF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer