ESBG vs. TDIV
ESBG (First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF) and TDIV (First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - ESBG is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by First Trust, while TDIV is a Technology Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index. ESBG is actively managed, while TDIV is passively managed. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ESBG charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for TDIV.
Performance
ESBG vs. TDIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESBG achieves a 5.96% return, which is significantly lower than TDIV's 28.74% return.
ESBG
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- 1.11%
- YTD
- 5.96%
- 6M
- 7.17%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TDIV
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- 12.56%
- YTD
- 28.74%
- 6M
- 26.30%
- 1Y
- 50.88%
- 3Y*
- 33.15%
- 5Y*
- 18.96%
- 10Y*
- 19.14%
ESBG vs. TDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ESBG First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF | 5.96% | 5.72% |
TDIV First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund | 28.74% | 3.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESBG and TDIV is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESBG vs. TDIV — Risk / Return Rank
ESBG
TDIV
ESBG vs. TDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF (ESBG) and First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESBG | TDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.92 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.92 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.95 | 0.87 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
ESBG vs. TDIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESBG drawdown since its inception was -18.84%, smaller than the maximum TDIV drawdown of -31.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESBG and TDIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESBG | TDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.84% | -31.97% | +13.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.14% | -3.17% | -6.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.27% | -4.84% | -1.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.45% | — |
Volatility
ESBG vs. TDIV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESBG | TDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.12% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.98% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.19% | 18.49% | +6.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.19% | 20.68% | +4.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.19% | 20.85% | +4.34% |
ESBG vs. TDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESBG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than TDIV's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESBG vs. TDIV - Dividend Comparison
ESBG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, less than TDIV's 1.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESBG First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF | 0.57% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TDIV First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund | 1.13% | 1.40% | 1.59% | 1.74% | 2.51% | 1.76% | 2.07% | 2.27% | 2.97% | 2.27% | 2.45% | 2.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESBG and TDIV have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TDIV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TDIV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ESBG.
TDIV has the higher dividend yield at 1.13%, compared with 0.57% for ESBG.
ESBG is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while TDIV is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for ESBG and 0.50% for TDIV.
Find the right allocation for ESBG and TDIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer