ESBG vs. PSI
ESBG (First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF) and PSI (Invesco Semiconductors ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ESBG is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by First Trust, while PSI is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Dynamic Semiconductors Intellidex Index. ESBG is actively managed, while PSI is passively managed. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ESBG charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for PSI.
Performance
ESBG vs. PSI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESBG achieves a 5.96% return, which is significantly lower than PSI's 104.81% return.
ESBG
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- 1.11%
- YTD
- 5.96%
- 6M
- 7.17%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSI
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- 15.64%
- YTD
- 104.81%
- 6M
- 101.91%
- 1Y
- 200.06%
- 3Y*
- 57.17%
- 5Y*
- 31.49%
- 10Y*
- 34.03%
ESBG vs. PSI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ESBG First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF | 5.96% | 5.72% |
PSI Invesco Semiconductors ETF | 104.81% | 9.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESBG and PSI is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESBG vs. PSI — Risk / Return Rank
ESBG
PSI
ESBG vs. PSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF (ESBG) and Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESBG | PSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 5.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.97 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.95 | 0.59 | +0.36 |
Drawdowns
ESBG vs. PSI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESBG drawdown since its inception was -18.84%, smaller than the maximum PSI drawdown of -62.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESBG and PSI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESBG | PSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.84% | -62.96% | +44.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -41.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -44.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.14% | -1.40% | -8.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.27% | -15.93% | +9.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.26% | — |
Volatility
ESBG vs. PSI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESBG | PSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 13.55% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 30.12% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.19% | 37.72% | -12.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.19% | 37.84% | -12.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.19% | 35.09% | -9.90% |
ESBG vs. PSI - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESBG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than PSI's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESBG vs. PSI - Dividend Comparison
ESBG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, more than PSI's 0.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESBG First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF | 0.57% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSI Invesco Semiconductors ETF | 0.05% | 0.10% | 0.15% | 0.40% | 0.61% | 0.14% | 0.21% | 0.52% | 0.83% | 0.21% | 0.68% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESBG and PSI have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PSI is cheaper at 0.56% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PSI is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ESBG.
ESBG has the higher dividend yield at 0.57%, compared with 0.05% for PSI.
ESBG is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while PSI is Semiconductors. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for ESBG and 0.56% for PSI.
Find the right allocation for ESBG and PSI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer