PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ERTH vs. SPHQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ERTH vs. SPHQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF (ERTH) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ERTH achieves a 0.55% return, which is significantly lower than SPHQ's 16.54% return. Over the past 10 years, ERTH has underperformed SPHQ with an annualized return of 7.36%, while SPHQ has yielded a comparatively higher 15.46% annualized return.


ERTH

1D
-2.53%
1M
-4.42%
YTD
0.55%
6M
-0.40%
1Y
13.85%
3Y*
1.43%
5Y*
-5.81%
10Y*
7.36%

SPHQ

1D
-2.93%
1M
2.94%
YTD
16.54%
6M
15.11%
1Y
25.84%
3Y*
22.34%
5Y*
14.14%
10Y*
15.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ERTH vs. SPHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ERTH
Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF
0.55%18.47%-13.56%0.12%-27.59%2.64%51.02%36.78%-12.49%30.53%
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
16.54%13.25%25.44%24.83%-15.76%28.03%17.36%33.64%-7.10%19.10%

Correlation

The correlation between ERTH and SPHQ is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2006

0.73

The correlation between ERTH and SPHQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (3 years) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ERTH vs. SPHQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ERTH
SPHQ

Real Estate

27.4%

-

Industrials

19.2%
22.7%

Consumer Cyclical

14.0%
4.4%

Technology

10.9%
32.0%

Energy

7.1%
0.6%

Utilities

6.9%
0.9%

Basic Materials

5.3%
2.1%

Consumer Defensive

1.8%
14.4%

Financial Services

0.3%
12.4%

Communication Services

-

2.5%

Healthcare

-

8.0%

Real Estate

ERTH
27.4%
SPHQ

-

Industrials

ERTH
19.2%
SPHQ
22.7%

Consumer Cyclical

ERTH
14.0%
SPHQ
4.4%

Technology

ERTH
10.9%
SPHQ
32.0%

Energy

ERTH
7.1%
SPHQ
0.6%

Utilities

ERTH
6.9%
SPHQ
0.9%

Basic Materials

ERTH
5.3%
SPHQ
2.1%

Consumer Defensive

ERTH
1.8%
SPHQ
14.4%

Financial Services

ERTH
0.3%
SPHQ
12.4%

Communication Services

ERTH

-

SPHQ
2.5%

Healthcare

ERTH

-

SPHQ
8.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ERTH vs. SPHQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ERTH
ERTH Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
ERTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ERTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
ERTH Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
ERTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
ERTH Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

SPHQ
SPHQ Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
SPHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ERTH vs. SPHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF (ERTH) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ERTHSPHQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.34

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.72

2.92

-1.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.42

12.48

-8.07

ERTH vs. SPHQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ERTH Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is lower than the SPHQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ERTH and SPHQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ERTH vs. SPHQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ERTH drawdown since its inception was -64.45%, which is greater than SPHQ's maximum drawdown of -57.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ERTH and SPHQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ERTHSPHQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.45%

-57.83%

-6.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.07%

-8.90%

+0.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.82%

-16.57%

-17.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.72%

-25.04%

-26.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.72%

-31.60%

-20.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.26%

-2.93%

-29.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.49%

-10.68%

-10.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.14%

2.07%

+1.07%

Volatility

ERTH vs. SPHQ - Volatility Comparison

Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF (ERTH) has a higher volatility of 6.57% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) at 5.88%. This indicates that ERTH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ERTHSPHQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.57%

5.88%

+0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.97%

11.30%

+1.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.34%

13.46%

+3.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.96%

16.59%

+6.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.56%

17.91%

+4.65%

ERTH vs. SPHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

ERTH has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHQ's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

ERTH vs. SPHQ - Dividend Comparison

ERTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, more than SPHQ's 1.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ERTH
Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF
1.93%1.46%1.00%1.28%1.22%15.33%0.21%0.71%0.61%0.87%1.06%0.79%
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
1.07%1.09%1.15%1.42%1.85%1.19%1.55%1.51%1.85%1.57%1.67%2.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


ERTH and SPHQ have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ERTH has higher volatility (6.57%) compared to SPHQ (5.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ERTH dropped -64.45% vs SPHQ's -57.83%.

On 10-year performance, SPHQ leads with 15.46% vs 7.36% for ERTH. On fees, SPHQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SPHQ has been the lower-risk option at 5.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPHQ has performed better with a 15.46% return vs 7.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPHQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ERTH.

ERTH has the higher dividend yield at 1.93%, compared with 1.07% for SPHQ.

ERTH is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while SPHQ is S&P 500. ERTH tracks MSCI Global Environment Select Index, while SPHQ tracks S&P 500 Quality Index. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ERTH and 0.15% for SPHQ.

SPHQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ERTH and SPHQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer