ERTH vs. QQQM
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF (ERTH) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM).
ERTH and QQQM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ERTH is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the MSCI Global Environment Select Index. It was launched on Oct 24, 2006. QQQM is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Oct 13, 2020. Both ERTH and QQQM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ERTH vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ERTH vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERTH Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF | 1.07% | 18.47% | -13.56% | 0.12% | -27.59% | 2.64% | 18.97% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | -4.75% | 20.85% | 25.68% | 55.01% | -32.52% | 27.45% | 6.67% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ERTH achieves a 1.07% return, which is significantly higher than QQQM's -4.75% return.
ERTH
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- -1.05%
- YTD
- 1.07%
- 6M
- -0.78%
- 1Y
- 23.98%
- 3Y*
- 0.23%
- 5Y*
- -5.35%
- 10Y*
- 7.24%
QQQM
- 1D
- 1.24%
- 1M
- -3.78%
- YTD
- -4.75%
- 6M
- -2.87%
- 1Y
- 24.28%
- 3Y*
- 22.91%
- 5Y*
- 13.24%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ERTH vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison
ERTH has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ERTH vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank
ERTH
QQQM
ERTH vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF (ERTH) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ERTH | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.18 | 1.09 | +0.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.79 | 1.68 | +0.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.24 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.92 | 2.02 | -0.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.71 | 7.35 | +0.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ERTH | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.18 | 1.09 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.23 | 0.60 | -0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.64 | -0.44 |
Correlation
The correlation between ERTH and QQQM is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ERTH vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison
ERTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, more than QQQM's 0.53% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERTH Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF | 1.48% | 1.46% | 1.00% | 1.28% | 1.22% | 15.33% | 0.21% | 0.71% | 0.61% | 0.87% | 1.06% | 0.79% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 0.53% | 0.50% | 0.61% | 0.65% | 0.83% | 0.40% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ERTH vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ERTH drawdown since its inception was -64.45%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ERTH and QQQM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ERTH | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.45% | -35.04% | -29.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.78% | -12.55% | -0.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.72% | -35.04% | -16.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.91% | -7.86% | -24.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.41% | -8.47% | -12.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.18% | 3.44% | -0.26% |
Volatility
ERTH vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison
Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF (ERTH) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) have volatilities of 6.75% and 6.58%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ERTH | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.75% | 6.58% | +0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.58% | 12.79% | -0.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.46% | 22.45% | -1.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.91% | 22.24% | +0.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.63% | 22.26% | +0.37% |