ERTH vs. CTEX
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF (ERTH) and ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF (CTEX).
ERTH and CTEX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ERTH is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the MSCI Global Environment Select Index. It was launched on Oct 24, 2006. CTEX is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Kensho Cleantech Index. It was launched on Sep 29, 2021. Both ERTH and CTEX are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ERTH vs. CTEX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ERTH vs. CTEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERTH Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF | 1.07% | 18.47% | -13.56% | 0.12% | -27.59% | 5.39% |
CTEX ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF | -1.03% | 67.74% | -20.38% | -10.25% | -20.38% | -6.68% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ERTH achieves a 1.07% return, which is significantly higher than CTEX's -1.03% return.
ERTH
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- -1.05%
- YTD
- 1.07%
- 6M
- -0.78%
- 1Y
- 23.98%
- 3Y*
- 0.23%
- 5Y*
- -5.35%
- 10Y*
- 7.24%
CTEX
- 1D
- 1.50%
- 1M
- -4.96%
- YTD
- -1.03%
- 6M
- 9.25%
- 1Y
- 101.54%
- 3Y*
- 2.06%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ERTH vs. CTEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ERTH has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than CTEX's 0.58% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ERTH vs. CTEX — Risk / Return Rank
ERTH
CTEX
ERTH vs. CTEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF (ERTH) and ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF (CTEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ERTH | CTEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.18 | 2.34 | -1.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.79 | 2.74 | -0.95 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.35 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.92 | 4.83 | -2.92 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.71 | 13.76 | -6.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ERTH | CTEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.18 | 2.34 | -1.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.23 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | -0.06 | +0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between ERTH and CTEX is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ERTH vs. CTEX - Dividend Comparison
ERTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, less than CTEX's 2.11% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERTH Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF | 1.48% | 1.46% | 1.00% | 1.28% | 1.22% | 15.33% | 0.21% | 0.71% | 0.61% | 0.87% | 1.06% | 0.79% |
CTEX ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF | 2.11% | 2.17% | 0.57% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ERTH vs. CTEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ERTH drawdown since its inception was -64.45%, smaller than the maximum CTEX drawdown of -70.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ERTH and CTEX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ERTH | CTEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.45% | -70.31% | +5.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.78% | -21.62% | +8.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.72% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.91% | -30.09% | -1.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.41% | -42.86% | +21.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.18% | 7.59% | -4.41% |
Volatility
ERTH vs. CTEX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF (ERTH) is 6.75%, while ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF (CTEX) has a volatility of 12.29%. This indicates that ERTH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ERTH | CTEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.75% | 12.29% | -5.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.58% | 33.73% | -21.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.46% | 43.72% | -23.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.91% | 43.16% | -20.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.63% | 43.16% | -20.53% |