PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ERBIX vs. EEIAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ERBIX vs. EEIAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Richard Bernstein Equity Strategy Fund (ERBIX) and Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund (EEIAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ERBIX vs. EEIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ERBIX
Eaton Vance Richard Bernstein Equity Strategy Fund
-2.81%18.35%15.00%14.63%-14.75%17.75%16.49%36.69%-11.86%20.94%
EEIAX
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund
-0.99%23.43%-1.23%13.63%-11.99%-7.64%4.68%22.66%-8.38%16.10%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ERBIX achieves a -2.81% return, which is significantly lower than EEIAX's -0.99% return. Over the past 10 years, ERBIX has outperformed EEIAX with an annualized return of 11.21%, while EEIAX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.56% annualized return.


ERBIX

1D
3.16%
1M
-6.32%
YTD
-2.81%
6M
0.68%
1Y
17.69%
3Y*
12.66%
5Y*
7.17%
10Y*
11.21%

EEIAX

1D
0.88%
1M
-5.04%
YTD
-0.99%
6M
4.40%
1Y
18.10%
3Y*
8.97%
5Y*
3.83%
10Y*
4.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ERBIX vs. EEIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ERBIX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is lower than EEIAX's 1.19% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ERBIX vs. EEIAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ERBIX
ERBIX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
ERBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ERBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
ERBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
ERBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
ERBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

EEIAX
EEIAX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
EEIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
EEIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ERBIX vs. EEIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Richard Bernstein Equity Strategy Fund (ERBIX) and Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund (EEIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ERBIXEEIAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.08

2.66

-1.59

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.60

3.68

-2.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.53

-0.30

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

2.45

-0.84

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.94

11.20

-4.26

ERBIX vs. EEIAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ERBIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is lower than the EEIAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ERBIX and EEIAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ERBIXEEIAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.08

2.66

-1.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.48

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.54

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.41

+0.28

Correlation

The correlation between ERBIX and EEIAX is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

ERBIX vs. EEIAX - Dividend Comparison

ERBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.67%, more than EEIAX's 10.48% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ERBIX
Eaton Vance Richard Bernstein Equity Strategy Fund
18.67%18.14%4.12%8.82%5.97%13.08%2.63%16.82%5.93%5.78%3.59%2.32%
EEIAX
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund
10.48%8.48%11.19%11.34%13.39%11.14%9.77%13.03%10.48%8.74%10.80%11.65%

Drawdowns

ERBIX vs. EEIAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ERBIX drawdown since its inception was -29.18%, smaller than the maximum EEIAX drawdown of -31.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ERBIX and EEIAX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ERBIXEEIAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.18%

-31.70%

+2.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.44%

-7.40%

-4.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.32%

-26.72%

+2.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.18%

-28.43%

-0.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.59%

-6.58%

-1.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.53%

-8.97%

+4.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.64%

1.62%

+1.02%

Volatility

ERBIX vs. EEIAX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Richard Bernstein Equity Strategy Fund (ERBIX) has a higher volatility of 6.49% compared to Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund (EEIAX) at 3.71%. This indicates that ERBIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EEIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ERBIXEEIAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.49%

3.71%

+2.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.26%

5.17%

+5.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.02%

6.83%

+10.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.91%

8.06%

+6.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.36%

8.43%

+7.93%