ERBIX vs. FMIEX
Compare and contrast key facts about Eaton Vance Richard Bernstein Equity Strategy Fund (ERBIX) and Wasatch Global Value Fund Investor Class Shares (FMIEX).
ERBIX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Oct 11, 2010. FMIEX is managed by Wasatch. It was launched on Sep 25, 1996.
Performance
ERBIX vs. FMIEX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ERBIX vs. FMIEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERBIX Eaton Vance Richard Bernstein Equity Strategy Fund | -2.81% | 18.35% | 15.00% | 14.63% | -14.75% | 17.75% | 16.49% | 36.69% | -11.86% | 20.94% |
FMIEX Wasatch Global Value Fund Investor Class Shares | 7.66% | 30.93% | 8.66% | 5.67% | -0.12% | 25.11% | 2.04% | 17.27% | -5.67% | 11.21% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ERBIX achieves a -2.81% return, which is significantly lower than FMIEX's 7.66% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ERBIX having a 11.21% annualized return and FMIEX not far behind at 11.20%.
ERBIX
- 1D
- 3.16%
- 1M
- -6.32%
- YTD
- -2.81%
- 6M
- 0.68%
- 1Y
- 17.69%
- 3Y*
- 12.66%
- 5Y*
- 7.17%
- 10Y*
- 11.21%
FMIEX
- 1D
- 1.53%
- 1M
- -3.71%
- YTD
- 7.66%
- 6M
- 12.40%
- 1Y
- 26.75%
- 3Y*
- 17.27%
- 5Y*
- 11.77%
- 10Y*
- 11.20%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ERBIX vs. FMIEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ERBIX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is lower than FMIEX's 1.10% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ERBIX vs. FMIEX — Risk / Return Rank
ERBIX
FMIEX
ERBIX vs. FMIEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Richard Bernstein Equity Strategy Fund (ERBIX) and Wasatch Global Value Fund Investor Class Shares (FMIEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ERBIX | FMIEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.08 | 2.22 | -1.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.60 | 2.97 | -1.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.44 | -0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.60 | 2.83 | -1.23 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.94 | 13.12 | -6.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ERBIX | FMIEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.08 | 2.22 | -1.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.93 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | 0.71 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.59 | +0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between ERBIX and FMIEX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ERBIX vs. FMIEX - Dividend Comparison
ERBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.67%, more than FMIEX's 4.88% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERBIX Eaton Vance Richard Bernstein Equity Strategy Fund | 18.67% | 18.14% | 4.12% | 8.82% | 5.97% | 13.08% | 2.63% | 16.82% | 5.93% | 5.78% | 3.59% | 2.32% |
FMIEX Wasatch Global Value Fund Investor Class Shares | 4.88% | 5.76% | 9.02% | 3.27% | 8.54% | 4.34% | 1.74% | 3.82% | 18.46% | 16.45% | 5.16% | 11.75% |
Drawdowns
ERBIX vs. FMIEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ERBIX drawdown since its inception was -29.18%, smaller than the maximum FMIEX drawdown of -49.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ERBIX and FMIEX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ERBIX | FMIEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.18% | -49.85% | +20.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.44% | -9.34% | -2.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.32% | -18.63% | -5.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.18% | -39.33% | +10.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.59% | -4.40% | -3.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.53% | -6.61% | +2.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.64% | 2.06% | +0.58% |
Volatility
ERBIX vs. FMIEX - Volatility Comparison
Eaton Vance Richard Bernstein Equity Strategy Fund (ERBIX) has a higher volatility of 6.49% compared to Wasatch Global Value Fund Investor Class Shares (FMIEX) at 3.91%. This indicates that ERBIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMIEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ERBIX | FMIEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.49% | 3.91% | +2.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.26% | 6.85% | +3.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.02% | 11.87% | +5.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.91% | 12.77% | +2.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.36% | 15.73% | +0.63% |