EQRR vs. TMVE
EQRR (ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF) and TMVE (Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds - EQRR tracks the Nasdaq US Large Cap Equity Rising Rates Index while TMVE tracks the Actively Managed. Both are passively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EQRR charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for TMVE.
Performance
EQRR vs. TMVE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EQRR achieves a 27.33% return, which is significantly higher than TMVE's 15.00% return.
EQRR
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 8.10%
- YTD
- 27.33%
- 6M
- 27.15%
- 1Y
- 41.70%
- 3Y*
- 22.28%
- 5Y*
- 12.33%
- 10Y*
- —
TMVE
- 1D
- 1.11%
- 1M
- 2.42%
- YTD
- 15.00%
- 6M
- 16.86%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EQRR vs. TMVE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EQRR ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF | 27.33% | 4.64% |
TMVE Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF | 15.00% | 6.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between EQRR and TMVE is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | 0.69 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EQRR vs. TMVE — Risk / Return Rank
EQRR
TMVE
EQRR vs. TMVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF (EQRR) and Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF (TMVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EQRR | TMVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.11 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.10 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.47 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 31.54 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EQRR | TMVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.11 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 3.25 | -2.82 |
Drawdowns
EQRR vs. TMVE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EQRR drawdown since its inception was -57.93%, which is greater than TMVE's maximum drawdown of -8.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQRR and TMVE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EQRR | TMVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.93% | -8.21% | -49.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.75% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.58% | 0.00% | -0.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.08% | -1.55% | -8.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.33% | — | — |
Volatility
EQRR vs. TMVE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EQRR | TMVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.72% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.35% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.50% | 13.98% | -0.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.39% | 13.98% | +7.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.87% | 13.98% | +10.89% |
EQRR vs. TMVE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EQRR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than TMVE's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
EQRR vs. TMVE - Dividend Comparison
EQRR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, more than TMVE's 0.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQRR ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF | 1.20% | 1.70% | 2.17% | 2.77% | 2.34% | 1.71% | 2.17% | 2.05% | 2.47% | 0.69% |
TMVE Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF | 0.10% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EQRR and TMVE have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EQRR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EQRR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for TMVE.
EQRR has the higher dividend yield at 1.20%, compared with 0.10% for TMVE.
EQRR tracks Nasdaq US Large Cap Equity Rising Rates Index, while TMVE tracks Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Thrivent. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for EQRR and 0.55% for TMVE.
Find the right allocation for EQRR and TMVE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer