EQRR vs. TMDV
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF (EQRR) and ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV).
EQRR and TMDV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EQRR is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq US Large Cap Equity Rising Rates Index. It was launched on Jul 24, 2017. TMDV is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 3000 Dividend Elite Index. It was launched on Nov 5, 2019. Both EQRR and TMDV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
EQRR vs. TMDV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EQRR vs. TMDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQRR ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF | 7.59% | 15.49% | 7.69% | 9.19% | 2.20% | 36.11% | -10.14% | 2.83% |
TMDV ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF | 4.14% | 2.91% | 2.64% | 2.25% | -5.10% | 23.45% | 4.82% | 3.26% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EQRR achieves a 7.59% return, which is significantly higher than TMDV's 4.14% return.
EQRR
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 7.59%
- 6M
- 10.49%
- 1Y
- 18.38%
- 3Y*
- 14.32%
- 5Y*
- 10.76%
- 10Y*
- —
TMDV
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -6.06%
- YTD
- 4.14%
- 6M
- 4.03%
- 1Y
- 5.15%
- 3Y*
- 4.21%
- 5Y*
- 3.75%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EQRR vs. TMDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EQRR and TMDV have an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Return for Risk
EQRR vs. TMDV — Risk / Return Rank
EQRR
TMDV
EQRR vs. TMDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF (EQRR) and ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EQRR | TMDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.02 | 0.35 | +0.67 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.42 | 0.61 | +0.81 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.07 | +0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.30 | 0.49 | +0.81 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.15 | 1.42 | +4.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EQRR | TMDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.02 | 0.35 | +0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.26 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.31 | +0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between EQRR and TMDV is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
EQRR vs. TMDV - Dividend Comparison
EQRR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, less than TMDV's 2.63% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQRR ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF | 1.43% | 1.70% | 2.17% | 2.77% | 2.34% | 1.71% | 2.17% | 2.05% | 2.47% | 0.69% |
TMDV ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF | 2.63% | 2.65% | 2.70% | 2.45% | 2.46% | 2.14% | 2.28% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EQRR vs. TMDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EQRR drawdown since its inception was -57.93%, which is greater than TMDV's maximum drawdown of -33.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQRR and TMDV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EQRR | TMDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.93% | -33.42% | -24.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.30% | -10.52% | -3.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.75% | -17.11% | -4.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.03% | -6.91% | +5.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.27% | -5.42% | -4.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.03% | 3.65% | -0.62% |
Volatility
EQRR vs. TMDV - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF (EQRR) has a higher volatility of 3.97% compared to ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV) at 3.78%. This indicates that EQRR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EQRR | TMDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.97% | 3.78% | +0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.70% | 8.35% | +2.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.15% | 14.86% | +3.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.49% | 14.43% | +7.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.03% | 18.78% | +6.25% |