PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EQRR vs. MDYV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EQRR vs. MDYV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF (EQRR) and SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQRR achieves a 28.12% return, which is significantly higher than MDYV's 9.52% return.


EQRR

1D
0.62%
1M
7.76%
YTD
28.12%
6M
27.54%
1Y
44.05%
3Y*
22.79%
5Y*
12.47%
10Y*

MDYV

1D
0.44%
1M
1.18%
YTD
9.52%
6M
9.53%
1Y
21.86%
3Y*
14.50%
5Y*
7.57%
10Y*
10.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EQRR vs. MDYV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EQRR
ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF
28.12%15.49%7.69%9.19%2.20%36.11%-10.14%19.57%-18.60%15.64%
MDYV
SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF
9.52%7.45%11.48%15.35%-7.19%30.51%3.68%25.89%-11.95%5.82%

Correlation

The correlation between EQRR and MDYV is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2017

0.71

The correlation between EQRR and MDYV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

EQRR vs. MDYV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EQRR
MDYV

Technology

32.1%
9.3%

Energy

26.8%
7.4%

Financial Services

20.5%
21.8%

Communication Services

11.7%
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

4.8%
13.5%

Industrials

4.2%
18.8%

Basic Materials

-

6.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

5.5%

Healthcare

-

3.5%

Real Estate

-

9.6%

Utilities

-

4.2%

Technology

EQRR
32.1%
MDYV
9.3%

Energy

EQRR
26.8%
MDYV
7.4%

Financial Services

EQRR
20.5%
MDYV
21.8%

Communication Services

EQRR
11.7%
MDYV
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

EQRR
4.8%
MDYV
13.5%

Industrials

EQRR
4.2%
MDYV
18.8%

Basic Materials

EQRR

-

MDYV
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

EQRR

-

MDYV
5.5%

Healthcare

EQRR

-

MDYV
3.5%

Real Estate

EQRR

-

MDYV
9.6%

Utilities

EQRR

-

MDYV
4.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EQRR vs. MDYV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQRR
EQRR Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
EQRR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQRR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQRR Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
EQRR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQRR Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

MDYV
MDYV Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
MDYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDYV Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
MDYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDYV Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQRR vs. MDYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF (EQRR) and SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EQRRMDYVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.25

+0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.94

2.09

+6.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

33.32

7.17

+26.15

EQRR vs. MDYV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQRR Sharpe Ratio is 3.30, which is higher than the MDYV Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQRR and MDYV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EQRRMDYVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.30

1.45

+1.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.39

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.42

+0.01

Drawdowns

EQRR vs. MDYV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQRR drawdown since its inception was -57.93%, roughly equal to the maximum MDYV drawdown of -60.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQRR and MDYV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EQRRMDYVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.93%

-60.71%

+2.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.95%

-10.53%

+5.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.75%

-22.58%

+4.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.75%

-22.58%

+0.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.07%

-8.62%

-1.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.33%

3.05%

-1.72%

Volatility

EQRR vs. MDYV - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF (EQRR) has a higher volatility of 4.69% compared to SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV) at 3.83%. This indicates that EQRR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDYV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EQRRMDYVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.69%

3.83%

+0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.36%

10.54%

-0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.48%

15.20%

-1.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.39%

19.50%

+1.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.86%

21.90%

+2.96%

EQRR vs. MDYV - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQRR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than MDYV's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

EQRR vs. MDYV - Dividend Comparison

EQRR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, less than MDYV's 1.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EQRR
ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF
1.20%1.70%2.17%2.77%2.34%1.71%2.17%2.05%2.47%0.69%0.00%0.00%
MDYV
SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF
1.72%1.72%1.89%1.59%1.90%1.74%1.69%1.83%2.28%2.48%1.83%4.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


EQRR and MDYV have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EQRR has higher volatility (4.69%) compared to MDYV (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EQRR dropped -57.93% vs MDYV's -60.71%.

On 5-year performance, EQRR leads with 12.47% vs 7.57% for MDYV. On fees, MDYV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, MDYV has been the lower-risk option at 3.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EQRR has performed better with a 12.47% return vs 7.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MDYV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for EQRR.

MDYV has the higher dividend yield at 1.72%, compared with 1.20% for EQRR.

EQRR tracks Nasdaq US Large Cap Equity Rising Rates Index, while MDYV tracks S&P MidCap 400 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for EQRR and 0.15% for MDYV.

EQRR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.30 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EQRR and MDYV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer