EQPGX vs. FSPSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class I (EQPGX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX).
EQPGX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 22, 1983. FSPSX is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI ex USA IMI Index. It was launched on Nov 5, 1997.
Performance
EQPGX vs. FSPSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EQPGX vs. FSPSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQPGX Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class I | -4.21% | 14.60% | 29.99% | 35.60% | -24.45% | 22.94% | 43.80% | 34.01% | 0.17% | 35.19% |
FSPSX Fidelity International Index Fund | 2.58% | 31.98% | 3.70% | 18.31% | -14.23% | 11.45% | 8.16% | 22.03% | -13.55% | 25.37% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EQPGX achieves a -4.21% return, which is significantly lower than FSPSX's 2.58% return. Over the past 10 years, EQPGX has outperformed FSPSX with an annualized return of 17.20%, while FSPSX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.14% annualized return.
EQPGX
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- -2.67%
- YTD
- -4.21%
- 6M
- -4.04%
- 1Y
- 17.96%
- 3Y*
- 20.66%
- 5Y*
- 11.40%
- 10Y*
- 17.20%
FSPSX
- 1D
- 1.61%
- 1M
- -1.87%
- YTD
- 2.58%
- 6M
- 6.46%
- 1Y
- 24.69%
- 3Y*
- 15.22%
- 5Y*
- 8.71%
- 10Y*
- 9.14%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EQPGX vs. FSPSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EQPGX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPSX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EQPGX vs. FSPSX — Risk / Return Rank
EQPGX
FSPSX
EQPGX vs. FSPSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class I (EQPGX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EQPGX | FSPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.87 | 1.47 | -0.60 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.36 | 2.01 | -0.65 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.29 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.54 | 2.23 | -0.69 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.37 | 8.47 | -3.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EQPGX | FSPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 | 1.47 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.55 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | 0.56 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.48 | +0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between EQPGX and FSPSX is 0.70, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EQPGX vs. FSPSX - Dividend Comparison
EQPGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than FSPSX's 3.07% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQPGX Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class I | 0.55% | 0.52% | 10.64% | 0.48% | 1.96% | 11.42% | 10.84% | 8.56% | 6.43% | 11.57% | 5.90% | 2.21% |
FSPSX Fidelity International Index Fund | 3.07% | 3.15% | 3.27% | 2.79% | 2.66% | 3.07% | 1.84% | 3.18% | 2.79% | 2.50% | 3.08% | 2.79% |
Drawdowns
EQPGX vs. FSPSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EQPGX drawdown since its inception was -62.00%, which is greater than FSPSX's maximum drawdown of -33.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQPGX and FSPSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EQPGX | FSPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.00% | -33.69% | -28.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.57% | -11.39% | -1.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.81% | -29.41% | -0.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.11% | -33.69% | +2.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.64% | -6.74% | -0.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.80% | -6.60% | -7.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.66% | 3.00% | +0.66% |
Volatility
EQPGX vs. FSPSX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class I (EQPGX) has a higher volatility of 7.79% compared to Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX) at 7.30%. This indicates that EQPGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSPSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EQPGX | FSPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.79% | 7.30% | +0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.37% | 11.09% | +2.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.86% | 17.03% | +4.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.16% | 15.83% | +4.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.49% | 16.50% | +3.99% |