PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EQNR vs. FDY.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

EQNR vs. FDY.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Equinor ASA (EQNR) and Faraday Copper Corp. (FDY.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EQNR is traded in USD, while FDY.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the FDY.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQNR achieves a 58.52% return, which is significantly lower than FDY.TO's 98.05% return.


EQNR

1D
-2.69%
1M
0.75%
YTD
58.52%
6M
63.00%
1Y
56.35%
3Y*
18.01%
5Y*
18.44%
10Y*

FDY.TO

1D
-1.52%
1M
2.15%
YTD
98.05%
6M
157.91%
1Y
584.19%
3Y*
94.23%
5Y*
53.03%
10Y*
48.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EQNR vs. FDY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EQNR
Equinor ASA
58.52%7.70%-15.98%-0.78%40.77%64.55%-13.57%-0.99%-21.06%
FDY.TO
Faraday Copper Corp.
98.05%286.57%8.29%19.51%-33.18%216.82%36.57%-6.13%-47.80%

Correlation

The correlation between EQNR and FDY.TO is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2018

0.09

Fundamentals

Market Cap

EQNR:

$91.58B

FDY.TO:

CA$1.44B

EPS

EQNR:

$2.15

FDY.TO:

-CA$0.12

PB Ratio

EQNR:

2.10

FDY.TO:

9.33

Total Revenue (TTM)

EQNR:

$104.23B

FDY.TO:

CA$0.00

Gross Profit (TTM)

EQNR:

$36.46B

FDY.TO:

-CA$322.61K

EBITDA (TTM)

EQNR:

$39.36B

FDY.TO:

-CA$33.02M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EQNR vs. FDY.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQNR
EQNR Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
EQNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQNR Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
EQNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQNR Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

FDY.TO
FDY.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
FDY.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDY.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDY.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
FDY.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDY.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQNR vs. FDY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Equinor ASA (EQNR) and Faraday Copper Corp. (FDY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EQNRFDY.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-6.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.70

-0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.20

17.20

-14.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.47

58.70

-53.22

EQNR vs. FDY.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQNR Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is lower than the FDY.TO Sharpe Ratio of 8.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQNR and FDY.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EQNRFDY.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.57

8.48

-6.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.81

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.23

+0.06

Drawdowns

EQNR vs. FDY.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQNR drawdown since its inception was -66.77%, smaller than the maximum FDY.TO drawdown of -99.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQNR and FDY.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EQNRFDY.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.77%

-99.04%

+32.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.72%

-34.27%

+16.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.58%

-48.74%

+21.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.50%

-65.83%

+30.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-84.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.82%

-17.71%

+4.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.47%

-39.90%

+18.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.32%

10.02%

+0.30%

Volatility

EQNR vs. FDY.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Equinor ASA (EQNR) is 10.82%, while Faraday Copper Corp. (FDY.TO) has a volatility of 23.05%. This indicates that EQNR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDY.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EQNRFDY.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.82%

23.05%

-12.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.77%

55.74%

-25.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.00%

69.51%

-33.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.88%

66.11%

-32.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.26%

103.88%

-67.62%

Dividends

EQNR vs. FDY.TO - Dividend Comparison

EQNR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.10%, while FDY.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EQNR
Equinor ASA
4.10%7.66%12.66%11.38%3.30%2.13%4.32%5.07%3.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FDY.TO
Faraday Copper Corp.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%28.29%49.11%93.28%

Financials

EQNR vs. FDY.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Equinor ASA and Faraday Copper Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B20222023202420252026
27.82B
0
(EQNR) Total Revenue
(FDY.TO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. EQNR values in USD, FDY.TO values in CAD

Frequently Asked Questions


EQNR and FDY.TO have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EQNR and FDY.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer