EQL vs. SZNE
EQL (ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF) and SZNE (Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - EQL tracks the NYSE Equal Sector Weight Index while SZNE tracks the Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EQL charges 0.27%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for SZNE.
Performance
EQL vs. SZNE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
EQL
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 1.02%
- 6M
- 7.84%
- YTD
- 10.57%
- 1Y
- 16.83%
- 3Y*
- 15.11%
- 5Y*
- 10.73%
- 10Y*
- 12.31%
SZNE
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EQL vs. SZNE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQL ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF | 10.57% | 13.09% | 16.44% | 16.87% | -10.72% | 29.32% | 10.87% | 27.87% | -8.63% |
SZNE Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF | 9.68% | -3.44% | 2.05% | 6.53% | -12.33% | 26.36% | 4.03% | 35.75% | -7.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between EQL and SZNE is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2018 | 0.83 |
The correlation between EQL and SZNE shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.84 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EQL vs. SZNE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EQL
SZNE
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Industrials
Utilities
Energy
Basic Materials
Technology
EQL
SZNE
Consumer Cyclical
EQL
SZNE
Real Estate
EQL
SZNE
Communication Services
EQL
SZNE
Healthcare
EQL
SZNE
Consumer Defensive
EQL
SZNE
Financial Services
EQL
SZNE
Industrials
EQL
SZNE
Utilities
EQL
SZNE
Energy
EQL
SZNE
Basic Materials
EQL
SZNE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EQL vs. SZNE — Risk / Return Rank
EQL
SZNE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EQL vs. SZNE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL) and Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF (SZNE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EQL | SZNE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.73 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.48 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EQL vs. SZNE - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EQL | SZNE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.19% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.24% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.28% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.24% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.61% | — | — |
Volatility
EQL vs. SZNE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EQL | SZNE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.60% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.11% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.53% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.55% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.49% | — | — |
EQL vs. SZNE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EQL has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than SZNE's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
EQL vs. SZNE - Dividend Comparison
EQL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, more than SZNE's 1.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQL ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF | 1.36% | 1.73% | 1.78% | 1.96% | 2.14% | 1.69% | 2.29% | 1.95% | 2.39% | 1.97% | 2.89% | 2.07% |
SZNE Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF | 1.23% | 1.47% | 1.20% | 1.21% | 1.11% | 0.79% | 1.37% | 0.90% | 0.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EQL and SZNE have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EQL is cheaper at 0.27% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EQL is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SZNE.
EQL has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 1.23% for SZNE.
EQL tracks NYSE Equal Sector Weight Index, while SZNE tracks Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation Index. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for EQL and 0.60% for SZNE.
Find the right allocation for EQL and SZNE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer