PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EQL vs. SZNE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EQL vs. SZNE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL) and Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF (SZNE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


EQL

1D
-0.34%
1M
-0.97%
YTD
8.44%
6M
7.90%
1Y
17.48%
3Y*
15.88%
5Y*
10.58%
10Y*
12.66%

SZNE

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EQL vs. SZNE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EQL
ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF
8.44%13.09%16.44%16.87%-10.72%29.32%10.87%27.87%-8.63%
SZNE
Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF
9.68%-3.44%2.05%6.53%-12.33%26.36%4.03%35.75%-7.01%

Correlation

The correlation between EQL and SZNE is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2018

0.84

The correlation between EQL and SZNE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

EQL vs. SZNE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EQL
SZNE

Technology

12.3%
25.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%
29.7%

Real Estate

9.2%

-

Communication Services

8.8%
0.5%

Healthcare

8.7%

-

Consumer Defensive

8.6%

-

Financial Services

8.6%

-

Industrials

8.5%
23.6%

Utilities

8.4%
0.3%

Energy

8.0%
0.3%

Basic Materials

8.0%
20.3%

Technology

EQL
12.3%
SZNE
25.3%

Consumer Cyclical

EQL
10.7%
SZNE
29.7%

Real Estate

EQL
9.2%
SZNE

-

Communication Services

EQL
8.8%
SZNE
0.5%

Healthcare

EQL
8.7%
SZNE

-

Consumer Defensive

EQL
8.6%
SZNE

-

Financial Services

EQL
8.6%
SZNE

-

Industrials

EQL
8.5%
SZNE
23.6%

Utilities

EQL
8.4%
SZNE
0.3%

Energy

EQL
8.0%
SZNE
0.3%

Basic Materials

EQL
8.0%
SZNE
20.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EQL vs. SZNE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQL
EQL Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
EQL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQL Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
EQL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQL Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

SZNE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQL vs. SZNE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL) and Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF (SZNE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EQLSZNEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.95

EQL vs. SZNE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EQL vs. SZNE - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EQLSZNEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.60%

Volatility

EQL vs. SZNE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EQLSZNEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.54%

EQL vs. SZNE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQL has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than SZNE's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

EQL vs. SZNE - Dividend Comparison

EQL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, more than SZNE's 1.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EQL
ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF
1.63%1.73%1.78%1.96%2.14%1.69%2.29%1.95%2.39%1.97%2.89%2.07%
SZNE
Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF
1.23%1.47%1.20%1.21%1.11%0.79%1.37%0.90%0.68%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EQL and SZNE have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EQL is cheaper at 0.27% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EQL is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SZNE.

EQL has the higher dividend yield at 1.63%, compared with 1.23% for SZNE.

EQL tracks NYSE Equal Sector Weight Index, while SZNE tracks Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation Index. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for EQL and 0.60% for SZNE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EQL and SZNE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer