EQL vs. RFDA

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

EQL (ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF) and RFDA (RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EQL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the NYSE Equal Sector Weight Index, while RFDA is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by SS&C. EQL is passively managed, while RFDA is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, EQL returned 12.39%/yr vs 13.32%/yr for RFDA. Their correlation of 0.88 means they have usually moved in the same direction. EQL charges 0.27%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for RFDA.

Performance

EQL vs. RFDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL) and RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQL achieves a 10.71% return, which is significantly lower than RFDA's 14.14% return. Over the past 10 years, EQL has underperformed RFDA with an annualized return of 12.39%, while RFDA has yielded a comparatively higher 13.32% annualized return.

EQL

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: 0.31%
• 6M: 6.82%
• YTD: 10.71%
• 1Y: 18.34%
• 3Y*: 14.59%
• 5Y*: 10.63%
• 10Y*: 12.39%
• ALL TIME*: 13.49%

RFDA

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 1.66%
• 6M: 12.44%
• YTD: 14.14%
• 1Y: 26.35%
• 3Y*: 17.71%
• 5Y*: 12.90%
• 10Y*: 13.32%
• ALL TIME*: 13.38%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EQL ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF	$3.33M	$2.84M	$2.70M
RFDA RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF	$102.21K	$102.34K	$118.80K

EQL vs. RFDA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EQL ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF	10.71%	13.09%	16.44%	16.87%	-10.72%	29.32%	10.87%	27.87%	-6.12%	18.37%
RFDA RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF	14.14%	16.42%	20.12%	16.98%	-8.58%	25.94%	11.26%	27.15%	-9.27%	19.86%

Correlation

The correlation between EQL and RFDA is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.75
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.88
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 7, 2016	0.88

The correlation between EQL and RFDA shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.89 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EQL vs. RFDA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EQL	RFDA
Technology	10.2%	15.4%
Consumer Cyclical	9.6%	8.1%
Healthcare	9.4%	12.2%
Utilities	9.4%	4.9%
Industrials	9.3%	9.3%
Financial Services	9.1%	18.8%
Communication Services	8.9%	6.2%
Consumer Defensive	8.8%	7.1%
Energy	8.7%	11.1%
Real Estate	8.7%	5.1%
Basic Materials	8.0%	1.8%

Return for Risk

EQL vs. RFDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EQL

EQL Risk / Return Rank: 79
EQL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
EQL Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
EQL Omega Ratio Rank: 78
EQL Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
EQL Martin Ratio Rank: 82

RFDA

RFDA Risk / Return Rank: 89
RFDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
RFDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
RFDA Omega Ratio Rank: 86
RFDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
RFDA Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EQL vs. RFDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL) and RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EQL	RFDA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.82	2.07	-0.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.54	2.85	-0.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.38	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.78	4.47	-1.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.89	15.99	-5.09

EQL vs. RFDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQL Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the RFDA Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQL and RFDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EQL vs. RFDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQL drawdown since its inception was -35.65%, roughly equal to the maximum RFDA drawdown of -34.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQL and RFDA.

Drawdown Indicators

	EQL	RFDA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.65%	-34.60%	-1.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.19%	-5.45%	-0.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.07%	-19.35%	+4.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.24%	-19.35%	+0.11%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.65%	-34.60%	-1.05%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.27%	-0.84%	+0.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.23%	-3.70%	+0.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.58%	1.52%	+0.06%

Volatility

EQL vs. RFDA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL) is 2.23%, while RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA) has a volatility of 2.85%. This indicates that EQL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RFDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EQL	RFDA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.23%	2.85%	-0.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.03%	8.65%	-1.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.50%	11.76%	-2.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.51%	15.72%	-1.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.49%	16.84%	-0.35%

EQL vs. RFDA - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQL has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than RFDA's 0.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

EQL vs. RFDA - Dividend Comparison

EQL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, less than RFDA's 1.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EQL ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF	1.35%	1.73%	1.78%	1.96%	2.14%	1.69%	2.29%	1.95%	2.39%	1.97%	2.89%	2.07%
RFDA RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF	1.77%	1.89%	2.23%	2.68%	3.57%	1.44%	1.62%	1.87%	2.44%	1.90%	0.98%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EQL and RFDA in my portfolio?

EQL and RFDA have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EQL or RFDA?

RFDA has higher volatility (2.85%) compared to EQL (2.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EQL dropped -35.65% vs RFDA's -34.60%.

Which ETF is better, EQL or RFDA?

On 10-year performance, RFDA leads with 13.32% vs 12.39% for EQL. On fees, EQL is cheaper at 0.27% per year. On volatility, EQL has been the lower-risk option at 2.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EQL or RFDA?

Over the 10-year period, RFDA has performed better with a 13.32% return vs 12.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EQL or RFDA?

EQL is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for RFDA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EQL or RFDA?

RFDA has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 1.35% for EQL.

What is the main difference between EQL and RFDA?

EQL is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while RFDA is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for EQL and 0.52% for RFDA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RFDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.