EQL vs. FTIF
Compare and contrast key facts about Alps Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL) and First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF).
EQL and FTIF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EQL is a passively managed fund by SS&C that tracks the performance of the NYSE Select Sector Equal Weight Index. It was launched on Jul 7, 2009. FTIF is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Mar 13, 2023. Both EQL and FTIF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
EQL vs. FTIF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EQL vs. FTIF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EQL Alps Equal Sector Weight ETF | 3.18% | 13.09% | 16.44% | 16.24% |
FTIF First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF | 19.63% | 7.79% | 0.50% | 12.52% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EQL achieves a 3.18% return, which is significantly lower than FTIF's 19.63% return.
EQL
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -4.16%
- YTD
- 3.18%
- 6M
- 4.20%
- 1Y
- 15.32%
- 3Y*
- 14.94%
- 5Y*
- 10.72%
- 10Y*
- 12.17%
FTIF
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 1.49%
- YTD
- 19.63%
- 6M
- 23.49%
- 1Y
- 32.50%
- 3Y*
- 12.74%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EQL vs. FTIF - Expense Ratio Comparison
EQL has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than FTIF's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EQL vs. FTIF — Risk / Return Rank
EQL
FTIF
EQL vs. FTIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alps Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL) and First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EQL | FTIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.03 | 1.42 | -0.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.50 | 2.00 | -0.50 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.31 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.31 | 1.93 | -0.62 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.43 | 9.48 | -3.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EQL | FTIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.03 | 1.42 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 0.69 | +0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between EQL and FTIF is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EQL vs. FTIF - Dividend Comparison
EQL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, more than FTIF's 1.17% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQL Alps Equal Sector Weight ETF | 1.71% | 1.73% | 1.78% | 1.96% | 2.14% | 1.69% | 2.29% | 1.95% | 2.39% | 1.97% | 2.89% | 2.07% |
FTIF First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF | 1.17% | 1.45% | 2.88% | 1.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EQL vs. FTIF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EQL drawdown since its inception was -35.65%, which is greater than FTIF's maximum drawdown of -27.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQL and FTIF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EQL | FTIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.65% | -27.83% | -7.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.90% | -17.27% | +5.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.24% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.27% | -0.57% | -3.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.28% | -6.28% | +3.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.42% | 3.51% | -1.09% |
Volatility
EQL vs. FTIF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Alps Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL) is 3.88%, while First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF) has a volatility of 4.25%. This indicates that EQL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTIF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EQL | FTIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.88% | 4.25% | -0.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.31% | 11.64% | -4.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.87% | 22.96% | -8.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.59% | 19.28% | -4.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.55% | 19.28% | -2.73% |