EQJS.L vs. FPX.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EQJS.L (Invesco Nasdaq Next Generation 100 UCITS ETF Acc) and FPX.L (First Trust US IPO Index UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EQJS.L is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Next Generation 100 Index, while FPX.L is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EQJS.L returned 8.68%/yr vs 11.21%/yr for FPX.L. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EQJS.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for FPX.L.

Performance

EQJS.L vs. FPX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco Nasdaq Next Generation 100 UCITS ETF Acc (EQJS.L) and First Trust US IPO Index UCITS ETF (FPX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQJS.L achieves a 22.58% return, which is significantly higher than FPX.L's 17.59% return.

EQJS.L

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: 13.65%
• YTD: 22.58%
• 6M: 23.09%
• 1Y: 47.91%
• 3Y*: 19.20%
• 5Y*: 8.68%
• 10Y*: —

FPX.L

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 7.73%
• YTD: 17.59%
• 6M: 18.64%
• 1Y: 40.47%
• 3Y*: 28.91%
• 5Y*: 11.21%
• 10Y*: 15.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EQJS.L vs. FPX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
EQJS.L Invesco Nasdaq Next Generation 100 UCITS ETF Acc	22.58%	12.27%	16.78%	8.31%	-20.39%	10.77%
FPX.L First Trust US IPO Index UCITS ETF	17.59%	26.94%	27.09%	16.75%	-27.92%	6.57%

Correlation

The correlation between EQJS.L and FPX.L is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.72
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2021	0.78

The correlation between EQJS.L and FPX.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

EQJS.L vs. FPX.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EQJS.L	FPX.L
Technology	38.3%	34.0%
Healthcare	19.4%	14.9%
Consumer Cyclical	12.7%	3.2%
Industrials	11.3%	18.8%
Communication Services	7.4%	6.9%
Utilities	2.8%	5.8%
Basic Materials	2.7%	3.0%
Consumer Defensive	2.6%	2.3%
Financial Services	1.7%	2.9%
Energy	1.2%	4.2%
Real Estate	-	4.1%

Return for Risk

EQJS.L vs. FPX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQJS.L

EQJS.L Risk / Return Rank: 87
EQJS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
EQJS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
EQJS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 86
EQJS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
EQJS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 84

FPX.L

FPX.L Risk / Return Rank: 55
FPX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
FPX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
FPX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 47
FPX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
FPX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQJS.L vs. FPX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Nasdaq Next Generation 100 UCITS ETF Acc (EQJS.L) and First Trust US IPO Index UCITS ETF (FPX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EQJS.L	FPX.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.06	1.77	+1.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.12	2.44	+1.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.30	+0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.07	3.31	+1.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.34	10.56	+6.79
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EQJS.L vs. FPX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQJS.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.06, which is higher than the FPX.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQJS.L and FPX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EQJS.L	FPX.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.06	1.77	+1.29
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46	0.48	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.82	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	0.82	-0.37

Drawdowns

EQJS.L vs. FPX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQJS.L drawdown since its inception was -32.10%, smaller than the maximum FPX.L drawdown of -36.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQJS.L and FPX.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	EQJS.L	FPX.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.10%	-36.97%	+4.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.40%	-12.19%	+2.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.83%	-32.16%	+7.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.10%	-36.97%	+4.87%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.97%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.36%	-0.76%	+0.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.46%	-11.99%	-1.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.75%	3.82%	-1.07%

Volatility

EQJS.L vs. FPX.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Nasdaq Next Generation 100 UCITS ETF Acc (EQJS.L) is 5.92%, while First Trust US IPO Index UCITS ETF (FPX.L) has a volatility of 7.16%. This indicates that EQJS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FPX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EQJS.L	FPX.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.92%	7.16%	-1.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.07%	14.91%	-2.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.65%	22.76%	-7.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.05%	25.68%	-6.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.23%	25.58%	-6.35%

EQJS.L vs. FPX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQJS.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FPX.L's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

EQJS.L vs. FPX.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither EQJS.L nor FPX.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EQJS.L and FPX.L in my portfolio?

EQJS.L and FPX.L have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EQJS.L or FPX.L?

On fees, EQJS.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EQJS.L or FPX.L?

EQJS.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FPX.L.

What is the main difference between EQJS.L and FPX.L?

EQJS.L is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while FPX.L is Large Cap Growth Equities. EQJS.L tracks Nasdaq Next Generation 100 Index, while FPX.L tracks Russell 1000 Growth TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for EQJS.L and 0.65% for FPX.L.