PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FPX.L vs. NESG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FPX.L vs. NESG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in First Trust US IPO Index UCITS ETF (FPX.L) and Invesco NASDAQ-100 ESG UCITS ETF Acc (NESG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FPX.L vs. NESG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FPX.L
First Trust US IPO Index UCITS ETF
-4.42%26.94%27.09%16.75%-27.92%-8.65%
NESG.L
Invesco NASDAQ-100 ESG UCITS ETF Acc
-7.13%12.47%28.73%48.88%-24.69%1.34%
Different Trading Currencies

FPX.L is traded in GBp, while NESG.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the NESG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FPX.L achieves a -4.42% return, which is significantly higher than NESG.L's -7.12% return.


FPX.L

1D
0.64%
1M
-5.10%
YTD
-4.42%
6M
-3.96%
1Y
37.27%
3Y*
19.98%
5Y*
6.20%
10Y*

NESG.L

1D
0.53%
1M
-4.20%
YTD
-7.12%
6M
-3.76%
1Y
21.34%
3Y*
19.22%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FPX.L vs. NESG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FPX.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than NESG.L's 0.25% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FPX.L vs. NESG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FPX.L
FPX.L Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FPX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FPX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

NESG.L
NESG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
NESG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NESG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
NESG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
NESG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
NESG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FPX.L vs. NESG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust US IPO Index UCITS ETF (FPX.L) and Invesco NASDAQ-100 ESG UCITS ETF Acc (NESG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FPX.LNESG.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.37

1.09

+0.28

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.96

1.59

+0.37

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.21

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.57

1.59

+0.98

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.02

4.28

+3.74

FPX.L vs. NESG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FPX.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the NESG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FPX.L and NESG.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FPX.LNESG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

1.09

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.51

+0.20

Correlation

The correlation between FPX.L and NESG.L is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

FPX.L vs. NESG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FPX.L nor NESG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

FPX.L vs. NESG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FPX.L drawdown since its inception was -36.97%, which is greater than NESG.L's maximum drawdown of -26.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPX.L and NESG.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FPX.LNESG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.97%

-34.69%

-2.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.42%

-12.01%

-1.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.82%

-11.29%

+2.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.24%

-9.41%

-2.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.30%

3.60%

+0.70%

Volatility

FPX.L vs. NESG.L - Volatility Comparison

First Trust US IPO Index UCITS ETF (FPX.L) has a higher volatility of 5.72% compared to Invesco NASDAQ-100 ESG UCITS ETF Acc (NESG.L) at 4.89%. This indicates that FPX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NESG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FPX.LNESG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.72%

4.89%

+0.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.52%

12.36%

+5.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.17%

19.63%

+7.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.74%

21.69%

+4.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.64%

21.69%

+3.95%