PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FPX.L vs. BLOK.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FPX.L vs. BLOK.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in First Trust US IPO Index UCITS ETF (FPX.L) and First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process UCITS ETF (BLOK.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FPX.L vs. BLOK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FPX.L
First Trust US IPO Index UCITS ETF
-0.74%26.94%27.09%16.75%-27.92%3.98%43.83%25.95%0.14%
BLOK.L
First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process UCITS ETF
-0.94%22.34%18.56%14.77%-8.98%19.08%15.05%22.59%-0.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FPX.L achieves a -0.74% return, which is significantly higher than BLOK.L's -0.94% return.


FPX.L

1D
3.85%
1M
-1.99%
YTD
-0.74%
6M
-0.84%
1Y
39.63%
3Y*
21.50%
5Y*
7.00%
10Y*

BLOK.L

1D
1.82%
1M
-2.65%
YTD
-0.94%
6M
5.70%
1Y
18.56%
3Y*
16.31%
5Y*
10.92%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FPX.L vs. BLOK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FPX.L and BLOK.L have an expense ratio of 0.65%.


Return for Risk

FPX.L vs. BLOK.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FPX.L
FPX.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FPX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FPX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

BLOK.L
BLOK.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
BLOK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLOK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLOK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
BLOK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLOK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FPX.L vs. BLOK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust US IPO Index UCITS ETF (FPX.L) and First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process UCITS ETF (BLOK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FPX.LBLOK.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.44

1.24

+0.20

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.06

1.68

+0.38

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.24

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

2.57

+0.49

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.67

8.75

+0.92

FPX.L vs. BLOK.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FPX.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the BLOK.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FPX.L and BLOK.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FPX.LBLOK.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

1.24

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

0.79

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.76

-0.03

Correlation

The correlation between FPX.L and BLOK.L is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

FPX.L vs. BLOK.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FPX.L nor BLOK.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

FPX.L vs. BLOK.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FPX.L drawdown since its inception was -36.97%, which is greater than BLOK.L's maximum drawdown of -26.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPX.L and BLOK.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FPX.LBLOK.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.97%

-26.23%

-10.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.42%

-10.77%

-2.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.97%

-16.43%

-20.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.31%

-4.36%

-0.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.23%

-4.34%

-7.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.85%

2.18%

+1.67%

Volatility

FPX.L vs. BLOK.L - Volatility Comparison

First Trust US IPO Index UCITS ETF (FPX.L) has a higher volatility of 6.77% compared to First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process UCITS ETF (BLOK.L) at 4.53%. This indicates that FPX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLOK.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FPX.LBLOK.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.77%

4.53%

+2.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.91%

9.86%

+8.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.39%

14.97%

+12.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.79%

13.82%

+11.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.67%

16.20%

+9.47%