EQJS.L vs. QQQ

In the year-to-date period, EQJS.L achieves a -9.98% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's -4.41% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

EQJS.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Nasdaq Next Generation 100 UCITS ETF Acc (EQJS.L) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current EQJS.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.04, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQJS.L and QQQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

EQJS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%.

The maximum EQJS.L drawdown since its inception was -32.10%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQJS.L and QQQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Invesco Nasdaq Next Generation 100 UCITS ETF Acc (EQJS.L) has a higher volatility of 9.27% compared to Invesco QQQ (QQQ) at 8.24%. This indicates that EQJS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.