EQIN vs. HDV
EQIN (Columbia U.S. Equity Income ETF) and HDV (iShares Core High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EQIN is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Columbia, while HDV is a Dividend fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index. EQIN is actively managed, while HDV is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EQIN returned 9.28%/yr vs 10.32%/yr for HDV. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EQIN charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for HDV.
Performance
EQIN vs. HDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EQIN achieves a 7.94% return, which is significantly lower than HDV's 12.69% return.
EQIN
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- 2.17%
- YTD
- 7.94%
- 6M
- 9.70%
- 1Y
- 17.40%
- 3Y*
- 14.91%
- 5Y*
- 9.28%
- 10Y*
- —
HDV
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 12.69%
- 6M
- 12.16%
- 1Y
- 20.35%
- 3Y*
- 14.94%
- 5Y*
- 10.32%
- 10Y*
- 9.26%
EQIN vs. HDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQIN Columbia U.S. Equity Income ETF | 7.94% | 9.37% | 13.82% | 11.58% | 0.66% | 31.18% | 0.67% | 30.67% | -12.22% | 20.05% |
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 12.69% | 11.90% | 14.16% | 1.72% | 7.05% | 19.45% | -6.48% | 20.22% | -3.01% | 13.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between EQIN and HDV is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2016 | 0.73 |
The correlation between EQIN and HDV shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.80 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EQIN vs. HDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EQIN
HDV
Financial Services
Energy
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
-
Financial Services
EQIN
HDV
Energy
EQIN
HDV
Industrials
EQIN
HDV
Consumer Defensive
EQIN
HDV
Technology
EQIN
HDV
Consumer Cyclical
EQIN
HDV
Communication Services
EQIN
HDV
Healthcare
EQIN
HDV
Utilities
EQIN
HDV
Basic Materials
EQIN
HDV
Real Estate
EQIN
-
HDV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EQIN vs. HDV — Risk / Return Rank
EQIN
HDV
EQIN vs. HDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia U.S. Equity Income ETF (EQIN) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EQIN | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.36 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.23 | 3.95 | -0.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.62 | 11.02 | -1.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EQIN | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.70 | 2.10 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | 0.81 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.72 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
EQIN vs. HDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EQIN drawdown since its inception was -42.16%, which is greater than HDV's maximum drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQIN and HDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EQIN | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.16% | -37.04% | -5.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.41% | -5.18% | -0.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.05% | -10.49% | -1.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.51% | -15.42% | -3.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.46% | -2.54% | +2.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.89% | -3.09% | -1.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.81% | 1.85% | -0.04% |
Volatility
EQIN vs. HDV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Columbia U.S. Equity Income ETF (EQIN) is 2.34%, while iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) has a volatility of 3.19%. This indicates that EQIN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EQIN | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.34% | 3.19% | -0.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.64% | 7.56% | +0.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.32% | 9.73% | +0.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.67% | 12.82% | +1.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.64% | 15.73% | +2.91% |
EQIN vs. HDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
EQIN has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than HDV's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
EQIN vs. HDV - Dividend Comparison
EQIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, less than HDV's 2.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQIN Columbia U.S. Equity Income ETF | 1.91% | 2.05% | 4.34% | 2.41% | 2.71% | 2.57% | 2.54% | 2.70% | 7.81% | 11.52% | 2.44% | 0.00% |
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 2.91% | 3.22% | 3.67% | 3.82% | 3.56% | 3.47% | 4.07% | 3.27% | 3.67% | 3.27% | 3.28% | 3.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EQIN and HDV have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HDV has higher volatility (3.19%) compared to EQIN (2.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EQIN dropped -42.16% vs HDV's -37.04%.
On 5-year performance, HDV leads with 10.32% vs 9.28% for EQIN. On fees, HDV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, EQIN has been the lower-risk option at 2.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, HDV has performed better with a 10.32% return vs 9.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HDV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for EQIN.
HDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.91%, compared with 1.91% for EQIN.
EQIN is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while HDV is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Columbia and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for EQIN and 0.08% for HDV.
HDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EQIN and HDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer