PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EQIN vs. HDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EQIN vs. HDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia U.S. Equity Income ETF (EQIN) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQIN achieves a 9.64% return, which is significantly lower than HDV's 14.07% return. Over the past 10 years, EQIN has outperformed HDV with an annualized return of 12.50%, while HDV has yielded a comparatively lower 9.45% annualized return.


EQIN

1D
0.74%
1M
2.08%
YTD
9.64%
6M
8.95%
1Y
18.62%
3Y*
15.26%
5Y*
10.50%
10Y*
12.50%

HDV

1D
1.33%
1M
-1.35%
YTD
14.07%
6M
14.08%
1Y
21.06%
3Y*
15.48%
5Y*
11.09%
10Y*
9.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EQIN vs. HDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EQIN
Columbia U.S. Equity Income ETF
9.64%9.37%13.82%11.58%0.66%31.18%0.67%30.67%-12.22%20.05%
HDV
iShares Core High Dividend ETF
14.07%11.90%14.16%1.72%7.05%19.45%-6.48%20.22%-3.01%13.40%

Correlation

The correlation between EQIN and HDV is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2016

0.73

The correlation between EQIN and HDV shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.80 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EQIN vs. HDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EQIN
HDV

Financial Services

27.1%
4.7%

Energy

13.3%
20.2%

Industrials

13.1%
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

11.7%
24.5%

Technology

9.7%
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

7.8%
9.2%

Communication Services

6.2%
5.7%

Healthcare

5.1%
22.6%

Utilities

3.7%
8.1%

Basic Materials

2.2%
0.8%

Real Estate

-

-

Financial Services

EQIN
27.1%
HDV
4.7%

Energy

EQIN
13.3%
HDV
20.2%

Industrials

EQIN
13.1%
HDV
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

EQIN
11.7%
HDV
24.5%

Technology

EQIN
9.7%
HDV
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

EQIN
7.8%
HDV
9.2%

Communication Services

EQIN
6.2%
HDV
5.7%

Healthcare

EQIN
5.1%
HDV
22.6%

Utilities

EQIN
3.7%
HDV
8.1%

Basic Materials

EQIN
2.2%
HDV
0.8%

Real Estate

EQIN

-

HDV

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EQIN vs. HDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQIN
EQIN Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
EQIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQIN Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
EQIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQIN Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

HDV
HDV Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
HDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDV Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
HDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDV Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQIN vs. HDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia U.S. Equity Income ETF (EQIN) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EQINHDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.36

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.46

4.09

-0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.30

11.19

-0.89

EQIN vs. HDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQIN Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the HDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQIN and HDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EQIN vs. HDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQIN drawdown since its inception was -42.16%, which is greater than HDV's maximum drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQIN and HDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EQINHDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.16%

-37.04%

-5.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.41%

-5.18%

-0.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.05%

-10.49%

-1.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.51%

-15.42%

-3.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.16%

-37.04%

-5.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.91%

-1.35%

+0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.87%

-3.08%

-1.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.81%

1.89%

-0.08%

Volatility

EQIN vs. HDV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia U.S. Equity Income ETF (EQIN) is 2.75%, while iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) has a volatility of 3.64%. This indicates that EQIN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EQINHDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.75%

3.64%

-0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.60%

7.61%

-0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.40%

9.93%

+0.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.61%

12.81%

+1.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.59%

15.73%

+2.86%

EQIN vs. HDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQIN has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than HDV's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

EQIN vs. HDV - Dividend Comparison

EQIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, less than HDV's 2.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EQIN
Columbia U.S. Equity Income ETF
1.88%2.05%4.34%2.41%2.71%2.57%2.54%2.70%7.81%11.52%2.44%0.00%
HDV
iShares Core High Dividend ETF
2.90%3.22%3.67%3.82%3.56%3.47%4.07%3.27%3.67%3.27%3.28%3.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


EQIN and HDV have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HDV has higher volatility (3.64%) compared to EQIN (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EQIN dropped -42.16% vs HDV's -37.04%.

On 10-year performance, EQIN leads with 12.50% vs 9.45% for HDV. On fees, HDV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, EQIN has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EQIN has performed better with a 12.50% return vs 9.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HDV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for EQIN.

HDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.90%, compared with 1.88% for EQIN.

EQIN is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while HDV is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Columbia and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for EQIN and 0.08% for HDV.

HDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EQIN and HDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer