PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EQIN vs. CRED
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EQIN vs. CRED - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia U.S. Equity Income ETF (EQIN) and Columbia Research Enhanced Real Estate ETF (CRED). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EQIN vs. CRED - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
EQIN
Columbia U.S. Equity Income ETF
3.68%9.37%13.82%12.69%
CRED
Columbia Research Enhanced Real Estate ETF
3.55%-2.30%5.21%13.18%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with EQIN having a 3.68% return and CRED slightly lower at 3.55%.


EQIN

1D
-0.31%
1M
-3.23%
YTD
3.68%
6M
6.50%
1Y
9.11%
3Y*
12.42%
5Y*
10.28%
10Y*

CRED

1D
0.42%
1M
-5.99%
YTD
3.55%
6M
-0.50%
1Y
0.32%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EQIN vs. CRED - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQIN has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than CRED's 0.33% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EQIN vs. CRED — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQIN
EQIN Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
EQIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQIN Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
EQIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQIN Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

CRED
CRED Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
CRED Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRED Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRED Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
CRED Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRED Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQIN vs. CRED - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia U.S. Equity Income ETF (EQIN) and Columbia Research Enhanced Real Estate ETF (CRED). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EQINCREDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.64

0.02

+0.62

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.99

0.13

+0.86

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.02

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.88

0.04

+0.84

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.27

0.12

+3.16

EQIN vs. CRED - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQIN Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is higher than the CRED Sharpe Ratio of 0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQIN and CRED, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EQINCREDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

0.02

+0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.40

+0.24

Correlation

The correlation between EQIN and CRED is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

EQIN vs. CRED - Dividend Comparison

EQIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, less than CRED's 4.92% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
EQIN
Columbia U.S. Equity Income ETF
1.98%2.05%4.34%2.41%2.71%2.57%2.54%2.70%7.81%11.52%2.44%
CRED
Columbia Research Enhanced Real Estate ETF
4.92%5.50%4.82%2.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

EQIN vs. CRED - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQIN drawdown since its inception was -42.16%, which is greater than CRED's maximum drawdown of -17.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQIN and CRED.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EQINCREDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.16%

-17.59%

-24.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.63%

-11.36%

+0.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.23%

-7.24%

+3.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.95%

-5.88%

+0.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.85%

3.94%

-1.09%

Volatility

EQIN vs. CRED - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia U.S. Equity Income ETF (EQIN) is 3.02%, while Columbia Research Enhanced Real Estate ETF (CRED) has a volatility of 4.35%. This indicates that EQIN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRED based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EQINCREDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.02%

4.35%

-1.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.02%

9.05%

-1.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.32%

15.43%

-1.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.78%

16.37%

-1.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.76%

16.37%

+2.39%